Comment Re:Well done... (Score 1) 133
What are the odds that MS is somehow involved in that?
If by involvement you mean a majority market share, the odds are very high.
What are the odds that MS is somehow involved in that?
If by involvement you mean a majority market share, the odds are very high.
But we can't get to questions like "Is feature X really worth Y dollars to me?" Because Linux does not cost money to install. It's like dividing by zero. It makes criticism of a missing component difficult because it doesn't cost me anything! How can I criticize it?! You will see people like Steve Ballmer have to dig and dig into imaginary costs of retraining, supporting and maintaining Linux to give it a "hidden cost" so that Windows can even begin to contend with Linux in price (you'll notice these concerns were suspiciously left out of advertisements when discussing the switch from XP to Vista).
These hidden costs are hardly imaginary. The time spent tweaking Linux to work on a given hardware setup might be better spent on more profitable things. I understand that with competent IT or competent users (even better), the transition from an "easier" OS to an open-source one can be made much smoother. However, in a business context, time is money. The time it takes to set up Linux and to retrain the employees to use it efficiently can discourage the more conservatively-minded.
COMPASS [for the CDC-6000 series] is the sort of assembler one expects from a corporation whose president codes in octal. -- J.N. Gray