Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re: Don't let.. (Score 1) 165

"If there were enough people in this community that want gigabit broadband to make it viable, some company would do it."

No, due to high startup costs, 1 comany would offer overpriced Internet no matter what the demand was for and in a fashion that only maximizes profits. Internet NEEDS to be a utility for the same reason why basic water needs to be a utility.

Capitalism is great except for the million ways it fails do to anything it promises, and is at its worst when there is no competition.

This is one of those times. You shrink regulation and you shrink beaurocracy, you end up exposing legislature to corporate lobbying and influence (money). There is no competition because no new companies can afford to enter the arena and said lobbying and legislature prevents the public from banding together and forming alternatives like EBP.

That is a broken system.

Comment Re: "skeleton key" (Score 1) 152

The issue is confused. The system is designed to prevent brute forcing, which is what the FBI originally wanted to do, but their recent calls have been for legislation to require tech companies to put in a back door to circumvent the encryption and only accessible by the device creators (yea, good luck with that).

Comment Re: No. That is not the strategy (Score 3, Insightful) 428

To be fair, the only arguably decent candidate from the DNP this go round is Bernie Sanders, and he is going to lose to Hillary-cesspool-of-lies-and-skeletons-Clinton. Ironically, that's because the black vote is going to a bougie fraud instead of someone who has actually worked for civil rights.

Yea, the GOP has a circus going on, but the DNP has the biggest clown, and she's not funny.

Comment Re: Athlon X4 845 why cut pci-e lanes? amd is losi (Score 4, Informative) 81

I chose an FX8350 over an i5 because performance was objectively better than the i5 that cost 50% more for the applications that actually exercised my CPU at the time (Planetside 2, BF3/4, and transcoding).

I would have had to buy an i7 at 2x the price to match the FX8350, and why do that when I could use that money to upgrade my graphics card to the point that no Intel processor could have matched the performance increase?

Not everyone is a Saudi Prince, after all. I have a job and a family to feed, and with only $1500 to spend on a gaming rig, why waste money on Intel?

Slashdot Top Deals

"The medium is the massage." -- Crazy Nigel

Working...