That you don't find the things Trump has done unethical is a bit disturbing. I hope, for both our sake, that whoever is elected president doesn't screw things up so much that they can't be repaired in four years when, hopefully, a more sane candidate will be on the opposing side.

If we're going to judge a site by a portion of it's users, what do we say about certain Slashdot users and their toxic posts?

As with any other site, 4chan has some problem posters, but it's also where I go to get ideas for the D&D campaign I run, where I discuss the TV shows I'm interested in, and where I get help with issues with my gaming computer. The vast majority of the site contains civil (though not always interesting) discourse. The biggest issue I run into is when someone asks repeatedly for the source of an image when it's listed in the filename or the bottom corner of the image I posted.

Am I? No. But with regards to paid transportation, the market for private transportation services may not be there in ten to twenty years for non-smart phone users.

If a person can't afford a smart phone, they're probably not taking a taxi or uber. They're taking a public transportation like I do for my daily commute to work.

While I appreciate your conviction for not purchasing a phone for privacy concerns, you have to understand you are a minority in this day and age, and a shrinking one at that. Not every private service will cater to you.

Sounds like a good idea, but it will not net you the change you want. All this would result in is a disclaimer at the bottom of the trailer informing viewers that the trailer is not based on the final product. That disclaimer would just as easily make things worse because it would give advertisers more leeway to put things in their trailer that aren't in the movie.

To use the same car analogy, in most car commercials, there is a disclaimer at the bottom explaining that the features they're talking about are only available in the super special addition which costs significantly more and not in the car available for the "starting price" on the screen.

You can start by checking out the video here - https://youtu.be/_8punyPP-bs

Oh man, I don't want to blow your mind, but we have something like that in Boston already - yoga for non-white people only. POC Yoga

I've wondered this myself, but several sites - including Wikipedia which states "The United Kingdom (UK) comprises four countries: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland." - all disagree with you.

Similarly, Sony recently tried to trademark "Let's Play". Like the Fine Brothers, however, they appear to be much too late.

Agreed. I encourage folks to check out Rocket Jump's video Why CG Sucks (Except it Doesn't). If you don't, here's the short version: we don't notice the good digital effects because they're so good or so subtle. We usually only notice the bad stuff.

Sure. Except in this case they weren't married.

From the featured article:

The difference here would be a contract. The film makers can prove they own the works of art. My guess is that the gentleman in the featured article could not.

Is the "us" in your statement referring to dickheads, people who break shit, people who inflate their own egos, or people who circle jerk? Or are you, as I suspect, all four?

Three reasons were called out in the article:

John Moody and his family moved from the islands to Springdale creating an existing community of Marshalese in the US
There's a Marshalese consulate in Springdale
There's an existing agreement that lets the Marshalese people live and work in the US

Somewhere, Alamo is saying "a cat durid is 4 invest"