Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Submission + - 31 Ways to Know Your Project is Doomed

Esther Schindler writes: We've all been there: The project went horribly wrong. Nobody was happy with the application or product (if it ever did ship). And you're ashamed to let anyone know you had anything to do with it. Especially since, with hindsight, you realize that the Signs Of Doom were there all along, and you missed them. When THIS happened, you should have known....!

This article shares 31 project danger signs you should recognize, so you can decide if it's possible to fix them or bail. But oh, we can be so certain that there are plenty more to add...!

Submission + - Don't be fooled by Opera browser claim of 150% battery life (computerworld.com)

richi writes: The Opera Web browser has a new 'power-saving' feature. Opera claims you can get 'up to' 50% more battery life — but is that likely? Uh, NO!

Yes, the actual software tweaks will make a difference, but the tests Opera's quoting are skewed, unscientific, and compare apples to oranges. But what do you expect from a company that's trying to get bought by a Chinese consortium for more than $1.2 billion?

Submission + - Would YOU Fire This Person? (certwise.com)

Esther Schindler writes: If “Tracy” were on your team, how would you handle her?

Among a project manager’s most painful tasks is firing an employee. Nobody enjoys the experience, even when the employee clearly deserves to be booted. But it’s much worse when an individual is a drag on the team, not a complete failure. Few of us are certain when it’s time to say, “I give up. I must get rid of this person.”

It’s an age-old management dilemma, but we can all learn from the way other people handle such situations. Here’s the story of a real team “problem child” and the troubles “Tracy” caused her manager. You get the opportunity to decide what you would do if you were the project manager. Then you can compare notes with other managers – before you learn how the story really ended.

Submission + - Things Sysadmins and Developers Would Change About One Another

Esther Schindler writes: Even in the best of organizations, the development and operations departments have friction. Each has its own goals, metrics for success, and team culture. Plus, ops is in the business of making things predictable and unchanging, while developers are in the business of changing everything. Those opposing priorities make it harder for dev and ops to communicate freely. Despite the industry’s ongoing efforts to bring the communities together, developers continue to grumble about ops, who simultaneously grumble about devs.

Grumbling doesn’t help to resolve the tension (or desire to throttle someone). Understanding does. So both developers and sysadmins were asked to imagine that they were granted a single wish: You have the power to give your company’s [ops team | development team] an understanding of one thing — just one thing — that currently irks you. What spell would you cast with that magic wand?

The results are in two articles: 3 Way Ops Can Help Devs: A Developer Perspective and 3 Ways Devs Can Help Ops: An Operations Perspective. Maybe it's not surprising that the shared component is: Listen to each other more. Share what you're up to, and what the goal is. (Kumbaya optional.)

But maybe some of the specifics can help you grok where the other folks are coming from. For instance:

As a developer named John writes, “Software development sometimes needs to be allowed to bend the rules/regulations in order to operate efficiently/quickly. Too many times, the rules (e.g., who has access, when, what can be installed, etc.) cause ridiculous delays in cycle time for development or support.”

and

A classic example is when developers assume always-on connectivity. “The network is not a static monolith that never changes,” one ops staffer noted. “We’re planning a data center network upgrade. It will require disconnecting every server and reconnecting them to the new switches.” That could cause some apps to think the entire world has ended and crash in an untidy heap.

Would you have included different magic spells?

Submission + - Google's Ray Kurzweil wants to live forever, and he thinks it includes nanobots (playboy.com)

Esther Schindler writes: Whatever else he is, Ray Kurzweil is undeniably fascinating, with intriguing predictions about the future — some of which might be accurate. In a Playboy interview, he discusses life extension and technology, as well as how he thinks they'll be connected.

When people talk about the future of technology, especially artificial intelligence, they very often have the common dystopian Hollywood-movie model of us versus the machines. My view is that we will use these tools as we’ve used all other tools—to broaden our reach. And in this case, we’ll be extending the most important attribute we have, which is our intelligence.

Part of what I like is that he sees ways to use technology for good and not for evil:

By the 2030s we will have nanobots that can go into a brain non-invasively through the capillaries, connect to our neocortex and basically connect it to a synthetic neocortex that works the same way in the cloud. So we’ll have an additional neocortex, just like we developed an additional neocortex 2 million years ago, and we’ll use it just as we used the frontal cortex: to add additional levels of abstraction. We’ll create more profound forms of communication than we’re familiar with today, more profound music and funnier jokes. We’ll be funnier. We’ll be sexier. We’ll be more adept at expressing loving sentiments.

Great read.

Submission + - Microsoft is really trying hard to play nice with Linux and open source. Really.

Esther Schindler writes: They're trying, honest they are. In 2016 alone, writes Steven Vaughan-Nichols, Microsoft announced SQL Server on Linux; integrated Eclipse and Visual Studio, launched an open-source network stack on Debian Linux; and it's adding Ubuntu Linux to its Azure Stack hybrid-cloud offering.

That's all well and good, he says, but it's not enough. There's one thing Microsoft could do to gain real open-source trust: Stop forcing companies to pay for its bogus Android patents.

But, there's too much money at stake, writes sjvn, for this to ever happen. For instance, in its last quarter, volume licensing and patents, accounted for approximately 9% of Microsoft's total revenue..

What say you? Has Microsoft become a good open-source citizen? Do you think it's possible for the company to do so?

Submission + - 8 ways to become a kick-ass programmer

Esther Schindler writes: We all want to get better at our jobs (whether it's software development or something else), but how do you go from "good" to "great"? Too many people aim for improvement without any sense of how to get there. Esther Schindler offers eight actionable guidelines that can act as a flowchart to improving your programming skills, such as "Stop trying to prove yourself right" and "'The code works' isn’t where you stop; it’s where you start."

Submission + - 11 Things Computer Users Will Never Experience Again

Esther Schindler writes: Why sure, who has resist geek nostalgia? Because "kids these days" only know about all-in-one computers, wherein you can destroy thousands of dollars of equipment by pouring a cup of coffee into a laptop keyboard. But, O Best Beloved, once upon a time, microcomputers weren't all-in-one devices. They were put together from standalone components, each with its technical merits. And we had to know all about every one of them. So take a short trip into the WayBack machine — via this collection of old computer hardware ads and photos of rats-nests of cables — to remind yourself how much better things are today.

Submission + - See the Sketches J.R.R. Tolkien Used to Build Middle-Earth. (wired.com)

Esther Schindler writes: In addition to writing the story, Tolkien drew it. The maps and sketches he made while drafting The Lord of the Rings "informed his storytelling, allowing him to test narrative ideas and illustrate scenes he needed to capture in words," reports Ethan Gilsdorf at Wired. "For Tolkien, the art of writing and the art of drawing were inextricably intertwined."

It's all coming out in a new book, but here we get a sneak preview, along with several cool observations, such as:

If Tolkien’s nerdy use of graph paper feels like a secret message to future Dungeons & Dragons players, then so does his “Plan of Shelob’s lair.” Tolkien’s map of tunnels stocked with nasties—here, a spider named Shelob—would be right at home in any Dungeon Master’s campaign notes. He even marks the place for a classic dungeon crawl feature: “trap.”

I said, "Ooooh!" You will, too."

Comment Re:Both types of learning are important (Score 1) 307

I agree that both types of learning are important. And that we need to learn to work outside our comfort zones, whatever they are, simply because in "real life" we're going to need to work in all sorts of environments.

I agree, too, when you say, "Group projects and collaborative work are, at best, tools that should be used in only limited roles in the classroom." We're talking about learning situations. That includes socialization, but it also touches on the best way for any given individual to soak up the factual knowledge necessary to get along in life, whether that's understanding Calculus, learning grammar, or writing a term paper. If the environment becomes a barrier to grokking the knowledge, then it adds to the difficulty of learning the subject. That is: If the only way that American History is presented to me is in a big group where I'm supposed to discuss it, and I find it difficult to be around people, I'm apt to end up less interested in American History.

Of course, the notion of using different types of teaching/learning applies more widely than introversion and extroversion. My husband (the extreme introvert) reads a book and applies the knowledge. I learn best when I have someone hovering over my shoulder, giving me slight corrections as I go. Other people like listening to a teacher at the front of the room. Shouldn't education include all of those, so that each of us can get what we need?

Submission + - How the FBI Hacks around Encryption (theintercept.com)

Advocatus Diaboli writes: To hear FBI Director James Comey tell it, strong encryption stops law enforcement dead in its tracks by letting terrorists, kidnappers and rapists communicate in complete secrecy. But that’s just not true. In the rare cases in which an investigation may initially appear to be blocked by encryption — and so far, the FBI has yet to identify a single one — the government has a Plan B: it’s called hacking.

Hacking — just like kicking down a door and looking through someone’s stuff — is a perfectly legal tactic for law enforcement officers, provided they have a warrant. And law enforcement officials have, over the years, learned many ways to install viruses, Trojan horses, and other forms of malicious code onto suspects’ devices. Doing so gives them the same access the suspects have to communications — before they’ve been encrypted, or after they’ve been unencrypted.

Submission + - Introverts STILL don't get respect

Esther Schindler writes: A few years ago, Susan Cain's book, Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking seemed to give the world a bit of enlightenment about getting the most out of people who don't think they should have to be social in order to succeed. For a while, at least some folks worked to respect the needs and advantages of introversion, such as careful, reflective thinking based on the solitude that idea-generation requires.

But in When Schools Overlook Introverts, Michael Godsey writes, "The way in which certain instructional trends — education buzzwords like “collaborative learning” and “project-based learning” and “flipped classrooms” — are applied often neglect the needs of introverts. In fact, these trends could mean that classroom environments that embrace extroverted behavior — through dynamic and social learning activities — are being promoted now more than ever." It's a thoughtful article, worth reading. As I think many people on slashdot will agree, Godsley observes, "This growing emphasis in classrooms on group projects and other interactive arrangements can be challenging for introverted students who tend to perform better when they’re working independently and in more subdued environments."

So the larger question is... why does this society still treat introverts as second-class citizens, when most of us are aware of the value of introverts' contributions? Why do all those "open floor plans" continue to be adopted in the tech industry, when some of us need peace and quiet in order to do our best? Even though I'm a relentless extrovert, I need my "cocoon time," and few work environments (or educational institutions training us for work) respect that. I don't have answers. Maybe you do.

Submission + - Selling Steve Jobs' Liver! 1

gskiba writes: Selling Steve Jobs’ Liver: A Story of Startups, Innovation, and Connectivity in the Clouds is a wickedly funny and satirical look at the high-tech industry and the cult of the entrepreneur. Just released, I’ve never read anything like it and once you pick the book up and start reading, you’ll find it hard to put down. I devoured it in one go.

Author Merrill Chapman is no stranger to the Slashdot community. Both editions of his cult classic, In Search of Stupidity: Over 20 Years of High-Tech Marketing Disasters , were reviewed on Slashdot. Liver is very much written in Stupidity’s subversive tone, sending up Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, startups, Y Combinator, China, CES, the Catholic Church, Apple, DEMO, hedge funds, packaging, Silicon Valley, zombies, the IoT, PowerPoint, and probably a dozen other topics I’ve omitted.

Let’s sweep any metaphor questions out of the way. Selling Steve Jobs Liver is indeed a contemporary tale of two Silicon Valley wantrepreneurs, Nate Pennington and Ignacio Loehman, who are contacted by a modern day ghoul and purchase the late Apple CEO’s original liver, removed from his body during his 2009 transplant operation (the book refers to it as the “1.0 version”).

Using the organ to create a “compelling value proposition,” the pair launch Reliqueree, a cloud startup whose mission is to “reposition” the market’s current perception of death and dying. The new company’s first product is the uLivv, a device that upon launch contains a sample of Jobs’ DNA extracted from his liver, a complete map of his genome (Jobs was one of the first people in the world to have his genome completely sequenced as part of his cancer treatment), and an interactive Steve Jobs persona, an “iBrain” built on top of his genome that can be trained to advise and guide business dreamers on how to be just like Steve.

Also part of the package is an extensive bundle of Jobs-based services such as Codex Steve, “(A day-by-day compilation of the life of Steve Jobs), The Steve Jobs Diet Cookbook, (The ultimate cookbook for people who don’t like to cook), and even exciting games such as Interview with Steve Jobs:

“Enjoy this brain twisting, mind-blowing game of knowledge and problem solving. Visit Steve in his office for a job interview and find out if you have what it takes to join Apple’s ‘A’ Team. Will he find you an “insanely excellent” hire or write you off as Team Bozo? Or even worse, subject you to a “Smelly Feet” dismissal?”

Of course, any self-respecting device requires a platform and development environment and the uLivv has both, the IoDT (Internet of Departed Things) and TransLivvient, respectively. Liver is told in the first person through the eyes of Nate Pennington, who is clearly an alternate universe version of Steve Jobs. Nate is a cheerful monster, burning with the desire to disrupt markets, change the world, fail upwards, and drive Reliqueree to a successful monetization event. Almost completely amoral, he’s a high-tech cross between Candide and Sammy Glick. Oddly enough, he often does the right thing, though invariably for the wrong reason, and moves through his entrepreneurial existence guided by a cloud of auto-generated aphorisms such as “Strong startup CEO leadership is marked by the ability to blend effective micromanagement with selective amnesia.” Like many other entrepreneurs, Nate hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid--he is the Kool-Aid.

When we first meet him and Ignacio, they’ve just hit entrepreneurial rock bottom, having guided three startups from inception to gruesome failure. Their last company, which drains them of their cash, optimism, and membership in San Francisco’s most prestigious high-tech incubator, is theTogetherhood. Pitched to the local VC community as a risk management system enabling towns and villages to protect themselves against financial downturns and liabilities, the product is actually an online hedge system that manages dead pools where the citizenry can “invest” in such things as local pet and citizenry mortality rates, or, in the words of the appalled incubator director, “monetize municipal evil.”

Making things worse is Nate’s discovery that his Chinese girl friend, Angie, is pregnant and determined that Nate make an honest woman of her, a turn of events which pleases him not all (and reminds us of a famous Cupertino entrepreneur who once upon a time was in a similar position). Despondent, Nate returns home to New York City (where most of the novel’s action takes place) to visit his intolerant, on-the-edge-of senility mother who is sure of only one thing and that is her son should not be marrying a woman whose proper place in life is either to process laundry or perhaps work the takeout counter at the local Peking Garden. Nonetheless, the trip turns out to be inspirational as a meeting with a mysterious Russian “investor,” a visit to his father’s funeral urn, and a chance encounter with a long dead Catholic saint all prime Nate to be ready to ideate a new business paradigm when Steve Jobs’ liver appears for sale on the human spare-parts market.

Now, this is all completely off the wall, but Liver’s narrative is completely deadpan and the story moves at a crackling and hilarious pace. Chapman’s technology background and accurate use of industry sales and marketing buzzwords and jargon helps create the story’s increasingly eerie atmosphere of reality. By the time you’ve finished the book, you’ll be muttering to yourself that maybe there’s a real business model to be found at heart of the tale. This feeling is only heightened when you begin to contemplate that, as Liver points out, you have no legal rights to your DNA or what’s done with it once it leaves the mothership, so to speak. Selling Steve Jobs’ Liver sports a rich cast of supporting characters including Boris, the company’s lonely and lovelorn Russian master coder, May Lei, his one true soul mate, packaging and design impresario Gruezén, who’s a very funny parody of Apple design god Jony Ive, Mother Cabrini, the aforementioned Catholic saint who has an important, though non-speaking role in the book, and yes, Steve Jobs himself, who returns to the industry stage at a major show in persona form and promptly begins taking control of the event, as you would expect.

Liver is perhaps at its funniest when Chapman is taking dead aim at high-tech pretensions, rituals and prejudices. Take as an example his description of the proper way to prepare for DEMO, the industry conference where firms who are preparing to make a dent in the universe launch their latest offerings in front of anticipatory audiences:

“While most attention is paid to the six-minute show-and-tell, there are other lesser-known but still important preparations you need to make to boost your chances of success. In no particular order they are:

If you’re over 30, moisturize, moisturize, moisturize.

DEMO likes its entrepreneurs to be dewy-eyed and under 30 if at all possible. It’s still sort of OK to be over 30, but you can’t look like you’re approaching 40! (See below.) Excess facial wrinkles, bags under the eyes, and deep gray hair are all no-no’s. There’s a mini-trend for startup CEOs to resort to plastic surgery, but in many cases this is overkill. First spend time watching the cosmetics segments of the QVC channel for useful products that can help. And remember there’s a reason God created Grecian Formula.

If you’re over 40, don’t come.”

I fully expect the characters in Silicon Valley to soon appear on screen reading Liver. They and the book are a natural bundle.

Check out the authors website .

Selling Steve Jobs Liver can be purchased on B&N

Gary Skiba is currently a principal software engineer at RF Code and a partner at investment firm GrokFish. Previously, he has worked at such firms as Katerra, IBM, Ashton-Tate, and Inset Systems. He provided technical advice to the author of Selling Steve Jobs Liver on some of the books technical issues and in regards to the pyschological foibles and quirks of programmers.

Submission + - Who Makes The Decision To Go Cloud and Who Should?

Esther Schindler writes: It’s a predictable argument in any IT shop: Should the techies — with their hands on their keyboards — be the people who decide which technology or deployment is right for the company? Or should CIOs and senior management — with their strategic perspective — be the ones to make the call? Ellis Luk got input from plenty of people about management vs. techies making cloud/on-premise decisions... with, of course, a lot of varying in opinion.

Slashdot Top Deals

"You must have an IQ of at least half a million." -- Popeye

Working...