It is true that the earth has more hard surfaces than we can produce pads for. Maybe.

But I don't think it holds that the earth equates to the world. The world is all the places that we as a collective exists in. And I am not so sure we wouldn't be able to build a padded cell big enough to stuff all the people into, then that would become our world. Purely a philosophical reasoning though.

So the question really comes down to that you possibly meant* the earth when you said the world, and I took it as an abstract construct that equals the place we live.

* Again; I make assumptions, it's a great character flaw.

Not I.
Everything that can be used to create porn will be used to create porn.
Even if something is only hinting at nudity there are those that will find it offensive and call it porn. *
Hormones do lower intelligence on all teenagers.
And these large artificial neural models that are open for all to use lowers the bar substantially for a horny and/or bullied teenager to do this.

This might not have been done out of spite or with ill intent. "Don't attribute to..."

*generally speaking of what "AI" models can produce, not in this specific case, where it's offensive because of other reasons.

No they don't, they just need to copy what science fiction writers have already written.

It's not racism it's specieism.

Has been done in the past. Wouldn't put anything past big pharma.

it's not really non-deterministic, the model is just too large for humans to determine the output of any input.

but given the same input under the same conditions would have resulted in the same output. Something that unfortunately is impossible to reproduce since the model have already changed after the output is given.

Not even quantum computers will become non-deterministic, the closest thing we can have is a camera looking at a robot arm throwing dice (or an analogue to this). And yet it would still not be non-deterministic, just too complex to tell the output.

Not really, when the quantum wave form collapse in a certain way that seem undeterministic is because you existed in the universe it collapsed in that way. It could not have collapsed in the other way in this universe.

Now if it were set before that or not is a philosophical question more than a physical one.

Lot's of examples of what we should prune from the humanity tree here... some even good.

We are never going to have safe trustworthy humans either. No matter if we were to hold their creators responsible.

At least with AI's... ...current form (llm)
we know that it's just regurgitated bs. ...future form (AGI)
they won't have stupid? emotional reasons for their actions.

Sure we can (make the world a padded cell).

We just should not.

I take offense when people confuse "can" with "should", even when people is I.

Well aren't you just comparing a llm with someone that's assumed to have real intelligence and can (should) actually understand consequences?

But a point valid for every interaction with this species and not just valid in this specific instance.

First off, it's always nice to be able to surprise a fellow human being every once in a while.

But if the spacecraft is up there? How do we get the bound co2 up to the spacecraft? Are you contemplating an elevator? Have you been having naughty thoughts? :-p

Oh, I got that you tried to be funny.

Didn't he already do that himself (in the great movie Tropic Thunder)? or were you being ironic?