Comment Re:Does that mean (Score 1) 50
There you go... Written with all the eloquence, intelligence and creativity I knew you had.
The judges mostly agreed that the idea of managing settlement risk with a third party was abstract such that by itself it could not be patented. They differed, though, on whether using a general purpose computer for managing settlement risk meant that the patents avoided invalidity based on abstraction.
Interestingly, some judges suggested that a computer becomes a "new machine" every time it loads different software. Opensource.com has Tiller's complete analysis.
With your bare hands?!?