Comment Re:A note about the study (Score 2, Funny) 211
That's a good start and all, but we need good musicians to speak out too.
That's a good start and all, but we need good musicians to speak out too.
We don't let horse and buggy on the interstate anymore, no matter HOW rich the idiot is. There's no reason to put up with IE6's shit anymore either.
I'm amish, you insensitive clod!!!
Seriously though, that's just about the most eloquent way I've heard it being put. I didn't have mod points so I decided to go with the above comment instead. Enjoy.
Why not force an upgrade to IE7 or 8 and separate the ActiveX functionality into a plugin IT personnel at companies that depend on that functionality can install. That way ordinary users who don't have the plugin installed don't have the security headaches ActiveX implies, and companies get to keep their ancient software.
That extinction level event was just as probable a thousand years ago and it didn't happen. This is the flaw in the "it's not a matter of if, but when" thing, because there's a certain probability of it happening tomorrow and there's another probability of the human race dying out in some other way—like as a result of global warming or resource depletion here at home—long before something like that happens. I'd rather my tax money be spent sending robots to do all the interplanetary exploration until it's cheap and safe enough to send humans instead. While I'm on the subject: RIP, Spirit!
You get about 20% more "clear sky" (Sites in Nevada have over 80% clear weather).
Are you really arguing against orbital solar by saying there's more clouds in space?
This is something I've never really understood. What is the rationale, if any, for making it so that the web browser updates the system? If you uninstall IE, can you still update your system?
The problem wasn't that a browser is really important and everyone needs one; the problem was that Microsoft had integrated their browser into the operating system in such a way that the operating system itself could not work without it, effectively making it impossible to uninstall it even if the user preferred another browser. Part of what makes other browsers more secure than IE de facto is that they don't have their tentacles as deep into the system as IE does. I'm sure someone will shoot back that it's not true, but really if you have a browser that's able to change system settings like IE can without asking for a password first, you're doing it wrong.
Nobody's really proposing that windows ship without a web browser; I think the current idea is to force them to give users a choice of web browser when they install it.
Nah it's a pretty standard UPnP system with well-documented open source programs you can run it on, like ushare (http://ushare.geexbox.org/). Like I said: pretty simple.
I am intrigued by your ideas, TheRaven64, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
As of last year or so the Xbox 360 plays MPEG-4 files just fine. I have mine play them over the network from my server.
c) We all know IE is way more promiscuous than other browsers.
Oh yeah. IE is a total whore.
Methinks it would avoid any anti-trust issues as well.
How is that? Microsoft could (irony!) sue for anticompetitive practices. It's not like that stuff gets any less illegal when people other than Microsoft do it.
I've gotta agree with adamdoyle's post. If someone sent me a resumé with the reply address configured that way, I'd probably think it was pretty neat.
How do you handle the replies? This is cool enough I might just try to do it.
Oops forgot this is slashdot. How insensitive of me!
Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.