Comment Re:Innovative features (Score 1) 140
Agreed. A most excellent summary. Pretty rare these days.
Comment Re:Conroy on ABC's Q&A next Thursday (Score 5, Funny) 401
I'll be in the audience. Suggestions on the most effective way to point out flaws in the proposed censorship regime welcome.
Throw a shoe at him.
Comment Re:Conroy on ABC's Q&A next Thursday (Score 1) 401
Don't forget you can watch this show via ABC's awesome iView service.
http://www.abc.net.au/tv/iview/
Q&A is available under the "CatchUp" section.
Q&A is available under the "CatchUp" section.
Comment Application? (Score 1) 180
It all depends on what output you need?
DAD software has the ability to customize data types, multiple inheritance of objects, and to define different relationship types.
You can then trace along object relationships bringing back a dynamic graphic depending on what you want to show (and spit out to PDF).
DAD software has the ability to customize data types, multiple inheritance of objects, and to define different relationship types.
You can then trace along object relationships bringing back a dynamic graphic depending on what you want to show (and spit out to PDF).
Submission + - whirlpool.net.au Founder Sued by 2Clix
An anonymous reader writes: news.com.au is reporting that the founder of the popular Australian broadband news and discussion site whirlpool.net.au, Simon Wright, is being sued by an accounting software firm 2Clix Australia. The claim centres around negative posts made in the discussion forum about 2Clix's accounting package. 2Clix is claiming that a number of the posts "relating to the Plaintiff and its software were false and malicious". A scanned copy of the Statement of Claim is available at whirlpool.net.au/img/article/2clix/soc.pdf.
I can only assume Wright is being sued as 2Clix can't identify the individual forum members. An interesting line from the SOC reads "[Wright] did not require proper verification of identity before permitting registration...". No Australian law I'm aware of requires formal verification of ID in this manner. I'm hoping that the legal system actually works for once and this case doesn't go anywhere. As Wright said: a lot hangs in the balance here. Of course if needed we can always post on overseas sites, like Slashdot for instance.
If you are interested you can view the two forums here and here.
I can only assume Wright is being sued as 2Clix can't identify the individual forum members. An interesting line from the SOC reads "[Wright] did not require proper verification of identity before permitting registration...". No Australian law I'm aware of requires formal verification of ID in this manner. I'm hoping that the legal system actually works for once and this case doesn't go anywhere. As Wright said: a lot hangs in the balance here. Of course if needed we can always post on overseas sites, like Slashdot for instance.
If you are interested you can view the two forums here and here.
