You got called on it, just admit you were wrong.. everyone can spot the bullshit deflections from a mile away.

Is it illegal for you to move to civilization?

No, the weak reasoning is treating books and TV the same.

Avoiding book spoilers is relatively easy. For most books, not everyone is reading it at the same time (and same pace), fewer people are reading it in general, and book plots (let alone the existence of books) are rarely covered by mass media. Avoiding spoilers for a show that 5 million people watched last night and have already generated billions of words on the internet about, including mass media sites, is quite different.

That's exactly OP's point. Those of us who didn't live through fascism or WWII (which I am one of) make casual 'Soviet Russia' or Hitler references without any idea of what the reality was.

Ya gotta pay the troll toll...

The previous efforts were about ~20% of the total project (in terms of earth moved), but ~45% of the total money spent. Both cases represent an usual definition of "most".

It's not. Both are incredibly rude.

"especially if they're not immediately next to major power lines"

None of those on major roads, no..

(And no, these do not need to be near 'major', i.e. transmission, lines. Any 3-phase primary is sufficient, same as most commercial customers)

The engineers at GM are well aware of this, and the Volt's computer is subsequently aware of it. If you have not filled in ~6 months, it will alert you to add fresh gas. If you don't, it will start burning off the old gas to force you to do so.

But thanks for this perfect illustration of the "But what about [problem that everyone knows about]? You'll be fucked!" comment.

The 5th amendment is not concerned with and has never provided protections relating to evidence. The interpretation game is being played by the "password=testimony" crowd.

This is going to hurt.

Unemployment statistics are based on one metric: did you actively look for work in the past 4 weeks?

That's it. Unemployment insurance has nothing to do with it.

Who is foolish now?

This is not factual. Yes, I know.. the guy who sells alternate statistics insists it is true and he couldn't possibly have an ulterior motive.

If you are looking for a job, you are statistically unemployed. That's the only criteria.

Length of unemployment and receipt of unemployment benefits are irrelevant. While those moving to lower paying jobs are counted as employed (pretty hard to argue otherwise), any reduction in pay gets reflected in wage data.

Have to keep in mind that when Twitter started, smartphones were not as common. The whole 140 characters is because SMS was the primary access method (and still is for many). Hard to get a text without giving them your phone number.

I don't think any MSW is dumped in the ocean (legally), that ended decades ago. Feel free to provide a counter-example.