Comment Re:Are you a human being? (Score 1) 527
You forgot at least two things:
- Profit!
- CowboyNeal
I think this should be a
You forgot at least two things:
I think this should be a
That's because Intel is years ahead of the other foundries and has been for some time. The spend countless billions a year on their fab processes.
Per Intel's January 2012 earnings report, their plan for this year is:
Capital spending: $12.5 billion, plus or minus $400 million
R&D spending: approximately $10.1 billion.
Which, compared to the size of my bank account, is "countless"
Perhaps they use a legal/union standard for their math -- 2 hour minimum for each interruption.
Me, I get paid to get the job done. If my brain starts writing an email at 10:30 pm, I'm happy to get out of bed and type it up. Saves me the need to remember to write it the next morning, and I get turn-around from others because my message is the latest in their inbox. This willingness to work on something for a tad after dinner or late at night means I go home at a normal predictable hour, see my family and spend good time with them, and have the freedom to flex my schedule.
Disclaimer: I work for a big company that values work-life balance in practice and still pays competitive wages. Your employer may vary.
If I had a dollar for each student who "just borrowed" a line or two from other papers or other sources, I wouldn't be a teacher anymore, I'd have a self-funded space program.
Plagiarize
Let no one else's work evade your eyes
Remember why the good Lord made your eyes
So don't shade your eyes
But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize
Only be sure always to call it please "research" [1]
[1] Paraphrased from Tom Lehrer's song 'Lobachevsky'.
To copy from one person is plagiarism. To copy from many is research. (citation not provided; quote is attrib. to various sources)
My belief is that the suffering through college calculus, has helped me build the toolsets to understanding the data, identifying the normal and outlier behaviors and then determining what are the probable causes and solutions.
Interesting indeed. College calculus has trained you in statistics.
This is not a dig at you -- I just find this connexion of input and output fascinating, and wonder how common it is.
Mod Parent Up. I have but one lifetime -- and someone out there wants me to spend it all on learning Esperanto.
The older I get, the more I become aware just how much we collectively know -- and how little of it I will have time to learn, apply, and teach others. Rather than follow along in real-time with the Mars story, I'll wait for the uninformed talking heads to move on to some other story because "Mars is old now." I'll read the intelligent executive summary after the research is completed.
And not only ending up in your mail box, but also having your name and address on the envelope. ie It was correctly delivered according to the sender's instructions.
IANAL and other disclaimers. But his name was not on the envelope. He caught every piece of mail that came to his domain. Here's a more true parallel: I bought a house, which has a defined postal address. Other people used to live here and so mail comes to their name at this address. Do I get to open their mail? No I sure as hell do not. If they address it to "Occupant" or to "Person XYZ or Current Resident" then I am entitled to access it. Otherwise, since the sellers didn't give me a good forwarding address, it's "Return to sender -- addressee unknown." Since he admitted he intended to create a confusing situation, the only mail he should have accessed was anything to wesley.kenzie@lockheedmarton.com or securikai@lockheedmarton.com, or other names such as he regularly went by -- and not robert.j.stevens@lockheedmarton.com or nolan.d.archibald@lockheedmartun.com.
I know USAns are terrible at metric system, but skewing the prefix by 6 orders of magnitude is just plain stupid. To make it easier for you USAns it's 450nm or 177nin (nanoinches, not Nine Inch Nails).
Incorrect. It is 450 millimeters (mm) in diameter. This translates to an approximately 18 inch diameter wafer. And that is huge. It needs completely new tools and materials handlers to be designed and tested; you can't just upsize the existing things, especially given the drive to decrease the thickness of wafers, thus increasing their fragility.
Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.