Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Whoa, they invented the maintenance-free plane? (Score 1) 389

Or perhaps this type of shit would qualify as an example of the violation of our freedom to take pictures of anything we want.

When the gov't wants to take pictures of you, the claim is always that there is no expecation of privacy in public. But if a private citizen wants to take a picture of something in public that the "powers that be" decide they shouldn't, some poor bastard gets arrested.

Military bases are one thing. When the military is working on a top secret project, they go to great lengths to prevent folks from taking pictures by secluding those projects, or picking remote areas for testing that are inaccesible by the public. This, I understand. You wouldn't want your defenses thwarted by potential enemies before you have a chance to use them. But this whole idea of "we can take pictures of anything we want, but you can't or face the consequences" boils down to a "do as I say and not as I do" mentality that undermines the very fabric of our society and sets up what amounts to nothing less than Orwellian politics.

Perhaps Corey Doctorow wasn't too far off the mark!

Comment Re:Possibly because it worked? (Score 1) 519

It really frustrates me whenever the media do a science story, especially one regarding medicine. In their desperation to focus on the human angle and "won't anybody think of the children" - and of course, increase number of readers - they completely ignore any basic scientific analysis.

Me too. Especially when someone injects a "won't anybody think of the children" comment into a discussion that is devoid of such remarks.

Comment Re:Feature? (Score 1) 210

Do they need to be there? Of course not. But they want to be, and most users put up with it. The blame lies equally with users who just say, "well, ok, I guess that's fine." They allow it to happen.

Isn't that like blaming users for M$'s crappy security implementations? The majority of users I deal with don't have a clue why things are the way they are and just accept whatever is fed to them as the way things are. System tray applets get installed because users think that RealPlayer, QuickTime, et al need that to run.

Comment You could always use it as a nas (Score 2, Informative) 544

There are many open source nas implementations available: FreeNAS OpenFiler and NASLite to name a few. I have personnaly set up 3 different NASLite boxes, and is the one I recommend for stability and simplicity (It is not free, but reasonable--around $35US). You will, however need to connect the laptop to a monitor for initial installation and setup.

Comment Re:Autorun? (Score 1) 507

Arguably, an alarm system is more important in keeping people out than the lock on the door. If they kick down the door and a message goes off that lets them know that you know they are there and that the police are coming shortly, they usually won't stick around that long.

Just long enough to take your LCD tv, XBox, PS3 and computer. Best to try to ensure that kicking in your door is hard enough they will give up before the cops get there. Trust me, alarms do nothing but annoy the neighbors. My shit is still gone.

Slashdot Top Deals

The question of whether computers can think is just like the question of whether submarines can swim. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

Working...