The act of sex between two consenting adults does not require lawyers and a bunch of legal language. It is insane, and hence retarded, to create all these ridiculous fucking conditions, and then claim that rape occurred if the sexual activity did not go exactly to plan.
According to the allegations, it was not sex between two consenting adults. One of the adults consented to an activity that was not performed and explicitly did not consent to the activity that was alleged. This doesn't require legal language or a lawyer, it's a simple fact of the two sex acts being different. Any person engaging in sexual activity can agree or decline to engage in specific acts. If she had agreed to, say, vaginal penetration but not anal penetration, and he had elected to penetrate her anus anyhow, it would be disgusting to frame that as "did not go exactly to plan". Consent can be conditional on specific actions, period.
She was there the whole fucking time. She could have stopped at any point. She is just as responsible for the unprotected sex as he is. Once again, SHE IS AS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE UNPROTECTED SEX AS HE IS.
We weren't in the bedroom, nor were we in her head. We can't know that she could stop at any point; we can't know that she was even aware that he wasn't wearing a condom. Furthermore, this logic essentially discards date rape as real rape. There is a huge set of possibilities here. According to her allegations, she did not agree to sex without a condom, which occurred anyway. She isn't responsible for that.
You're a complete fucking retard to be going on and on and on about how consent can be retroactively revoked because something did not happen. In this case it is a condom, but according to your logic, because it is limited to the concept of consent and legal contracts, it could be fucking anything.
I didn't say it can be retroactively revoked, not once. I'm saying it was never given in the first place. She, again according to her allegations, did not consent to unprotected sex at all. You can't frame this as something that happened after the fact.
Then you call us rape defenders. Well, fuck you. I'm all for castrating men who have performed rape. This was not rape. Period.
It may or may not have been rape. But if her allegations are true, it certainly was. Denying it by assigning blame to her for something she didn't agree to do is rape denial, period.