This basically means we're staying in Afghanistan indefinitely. Even worse, in the end the only ones who will benefit are the corporations. The taxpayers and the government will never see any of that money.
Who do you think works for the corporations? Answer: The taxpayers.
Also, do you think mining is going to be a nonprofit organization? They'll pay taxes to the government.
This is great news because this could help wipe out Afghanistan's poverty, the actual biggest obstacle to a functioning government.
And as we all know, local people always benefit from mining, extracting, and harvesting operations. Just ask the folks in Nigeria how they are benefitting from oil operations.
...So, politicians focus on the marginal seats. Think Florida, which could go either way.
It just so happens a number of those seats are, currently, in and around Adelaide; a highly religious, conservative city known as "The City of Churches"...
Which means our current administration is pushing through knee-jerk think-of-the-children legislation while the opposition is basically screaming "US TOO BUT BIGGER, BETTER, MORE KNEE-JERKY."
It's pure horseshit and doesn't represent the will of the Australian people at all.
Sorry for the mess you're in. I hope we in Canada don't end up with the same Tweedledumb or Tweedledumber no choice between parties.
If you create conditions where someone makes an app for smartphones (open government data), and it only gets used by people with smartphones, this is a net gain for the society
Nonsense. The folk with smartphones are typically those who'd already interact with government. You are doing absolutely nothing to interact with those who are totally disenfranchised. You know - the ones who cannot afford the net, cannot afford a fancy phone?
I think you have made too large an assumption and ignored the points about the usefulness of allowing people to interact how, when, and in a manner of their choosing. Good apps are a net benefit.
It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White