Oh. It also tells the camera's software what kind of lens is attached.
I'd imagine some of that is a form of DRM (like in ink cartridges) but it also provides the camera useful data about the lens characteristics that is used by to tune/drive focus, exposure, etc.
Physical connections, for the most part. You'd have to make an adapter, and keep in mind that changes the element spacing (eg the lens is now a bit farther from the sensor/film)
There's also some extra bits. For example, the lens assembly for my Canon has an electrical connector to support the focus mode switch (that's on the lens body) as well as to drive the focus servos.
You could put conditions in to (effectively) apply this to only mass manufacturers.
How this is done I leave unstated, but I'd imagine you could do it by looking at a variety of factors.
This way, big companies making thousands of identical items can provide parts (because they have (require) the infrastructure to store/ship all the bits and pieces) play fair, but small folks like you or other "craftsmen" don't have yet more unreasonable demands placed upon them.
... which then results in the boycotted boycotting the boycotter... by wearing their skin?
No. Peak, as in local maxima.
Geek points is Y, X is the complicated-geeky-contrived solution factor. Points go up as X does, to a point, but then it swings down in a negative slope and does not return.
(also: probably this is a woosh)
There's a peak where you start losing points instead. This is well into that part of the function.
NPR was talking about it on the radio on my commute this morning.
The skeleton also had the humped back and lots of evidence of battle wounds, and the nearby location, all matched up with what we understand historically. Finally, DNA testing with ancestors at least strongly indicates a relation.
It's a "mock"-up, for sure.
What?
And that's not what I meant. It was in a flight manual or something. Various conditions that ended with "you will not be X today"
What's that based off of? Seems familiar.
Who would have thought that just randomly poking memory of a laptop would brick it. Long ago Samsung told me that it was just fine to be doing this, and that there would not be any problems (I based the samsung-laptop driver on code that Samsung themselves gave me.)
Hmm... so the firmware is so retarded that bad values in RAM can permanently break the hardware?
That sounds safe. Hope that thing comes with ECC RAM!
I'm pretty sure the JDK's debugger would do what you want, if you could figure out how to work it.
... and where do you think the code to display that button came from? Not from C#, but from the
But most hackers aren't interested in your cable box, or your DVR. They want something they can use to brute force passwords with, send email to others through, force into a ddos, or just use to plain straight up steal personal data with.
They should be. Those kinds of always-on always-connected low-demand systems would make perfect botnet zombies in great numbers, and I'd argue there are more of them out there than computers. Hell even if the botnet slowed the thing down, how many folks would you expect to notice? Even fewer than that are the amount who could/would do anything about it.
But it needs to stay away from the high risk environment of the browser.
FTFY. There's nothing wrong with Java on the desktop... but there's everything wrong with it running in the web browser.
"Gotcha, you snot-necked weenies!" -- Post Bros. Comics
