Comment Re:Should Virginia settle with a "take back" offer (Score 1) 182
I suspect it's more about the negative publicity than "Please don't sue us". Cisco has incredibly deep pockets (mostly cost they sell $20k routers to 2 person part time libraries), and could tie anything like that up on court till the cows come home.
Well considering this was one of the recommendations from the auditor's report:
The State Purchasing Division should determine whether the actions or inactions by the Cisco representatives fall under the purview of 5A-3-33d of the West Virginia Code and are grounds for debarment.
I would say they are trying to keep their current contract with the state. It is about trying to bail out of this remedy.