I don't think the guy is thinking about Saccades
These are tiny, quick movements that the eye makes that keep "refreshing" our field of view.
Here's the explanation from Wikipedia:
Humans and other animals do not look at a scene in a steady way. Instead, the eyes move around, locating interesting parts of the scene and building up a mental 'map' corresponding to the scene. One reason for saccades of the human eye is that the central part of the retina, the fovea, plays a critical role in resolving objects. By moving the eye so that small parts of a scene can be sensed with greater resolution, body resources can be used more efficiently.
In addition, the human eye is in a constant state of vibration, oscillating back and forth at a rate of about 30-70 Hz. These microsaccades are tiny movements, roughly 20 arcseconds in excursion and are completely imperceptible under normal circumstances. They serve to refresh the image being cast onto the rod cells and cone cells at the back of the eye. Without microsaccades, staring fixedly at something would cause the vision to cease after a few seconds since rods and cones only respond to a change in luminance.
So while this happens naturally in all of our eyes, our brains compensate for it automatically and we don't notice anything is happening.
On video, though, this would probably make the video unwatchable and/or cause dizziness and nausea for anyone viewing it. It might be help in researching eye-movement patterns, though.
"Like China, authoritarianism works on a population accustomed to it and enjoying a rapidly rising standard of living.">
This is surely incorrect. The USSR functioned for almost seven decades. The people of the Ukraine clearly had a falling standard of living as Stalin starved them but failed to successfully revolt or change the system. Likewise in China, the cultural revolution was not something associated with a huge rise in living standards but Communism survived.
Many people attribute Stalin's success in starving the 10 million + Ukrainians to death in the 1930's to gun control laws enacted earlier when the Communists came to power, and the success of the Chinese Cultural Revolution to the previous government's gun control laws enacted over ten years earlier. If you have guns and the population doesn't, then it doesn't matter whether their standard of living is rising or falling.
FOR gun control; Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin
"For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient and the world will follow our lead to the future!"
-- Adolf Hitler, 1935
The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.
Adolf Hitler, 1941
AGAINST gun control; Mahatma Gandhi
"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest."
-- Mahatma Gandhi (he was against violence, but appreciated the ability of the gun to deter violence - the British did not treat the Indians well at all)
We are not a loved organization, but we are a respected one. -- John Fisher