You could also take any given cell from your anal sphincter and use its DNA to clone 100000 exactly similar persons.

Does that make your asshole a child?

That's because Discover was one of the first items of cargo Sears jettisoned as its ship started taking on water.

Maybe they should add "catch (...) { }" to the language.

But seriously, they proposed a rather straightforward streamlined syntax for errors a couple of years ago, but it was rejected by the community. Back to the drawing board.

I personally don't mind the very explicit error handling too much. It kind of makes it clear that you've though through at least some of the corner cases.

Don't fall for it, it's a trick. This Boss is very hard to beat.

However, over at xboxtopwalkthroughs.com, they give tips on how to defeat him. First: don't fall for his traps like this apparent career reassurance. Second: stay to the back of the conference room and always try to hit him from the side. Keep moving and never let him fix his laser pointer on you. Make sure you have plenty of ammo; it takes dozens of hits to finally finish him off.

If I have to run in C++ slow debug mode, maybe I should just use a safer, slightly slower language like Java, Go or Pascal in the first place.

"But you only use debug mode while your developing!"

That's probably only testing the happy paths.

"Then you should use $CODE_COVERAGE_TOOL!"

This is really getting complicated and expensive. Why not just begin migrating to Rust like the article said?

But it doesn't hurt. Maybe not until months after you've shipped production code.

How recent? Is this enough?

g++ --version
g++ 12.2.0
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Is there anything wrong with this code?

#include <vector>
 
int main() {
    auto v = std::vector<int>({1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1});
    for (auto n : v) {
        if (n == 1) {
            v.push_back(2);
        }
    }
    return 0;
}

The compiler seems to think it's OK:

$ g++ -Wall -pedantic t2.cpp
$ echo $?
0

Spoiler: Might there be a rule about iterators that you have to manually remember/enforce? Might there be literally hundreds of other rules in the language that you also have to manually remember/enforce?

Wow, that's a lot of problems with refrigeration cycles. If you own an air conditioner, I recommend you get it ripped out to avoid all the suffering.

Well, it is called "Spirit" AeroSystems, so no beer at the worksite. Instead, they have gin and whiskey dispensers on the factory floor.

Well, Microsoft does make it hard to avoid Poe's law when you try to make fun of their design choices. No matter how outrageous you make it, it still looks plausible.

Yada, yada yada.

Someone always says that. Blah blah STATES, except when you don't agree with some state, then you rely on the rigged SCOTUS to overrule them.

People in Montana or Iowa don't care about the needs of people in more populous states, but they saddle us all with leaders like that orange moron anyway. Like I said, it's the tyranny of the minority.

God damned, you are overthinking things.

In both cases, the minority of the voters select the winners.

End of story.

Whatever you call it, Mr. Pedantic, the outcome is the same.

The article didn't explain the actual syntax of the shell command:

C:\> System.Service.Get-Privileges(Get-Users.CurrentUser) | ExecuteProcessWithAlternatePrivileges --ExecuteTime="Now" --ExecutePriority="Standard" --AssumeUserIdentity="MyDomain\\Administrators\\DefaultAdministrator" --WithAccessControlList="Default" --CommandToRun="DEL MYFILE~1.TXT"

The US constitution is gerrymandered. People in nearly empty states get several times as much voting power in presidential elections as people in highly populated states.

If you haven't noticed, "rural friendly" presidents tend to be elected into office with a minority of the overall votes lately.