Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Vaccines should be mandatory. (Score 1) 1025

We took a wait and see approach.

When the first study came up saying there was a link, we did a risk/reward scenario. If we vaccinated, there was an increased chance of autism. If we didn't vaccinated, there was very little increased risk (herd immunity hadn't been compromised yet). Neither one of us is a biologist, so we were in no position to evaluate the study. We talked to several doctors, half of which also choose not to vaccinate their children. As a bonus, this path gave us more options: we could always change our mind later, but you can't un-vaccinate.

Several new study come out saying that the first study was full of shite. The risk is much lower, because the current known side effects all have a much lower probability. At this point, we had all of our children vaccinated.

Isn't that what critical thinking is? Evaluating information, making the best decisions you can, and re-evaluating things when the information changes?

Comment Re:Wow, is this scary (Score 1) 221

That's not entirely true. The US's laws are based on the English Legal system, and include precedents set in England before the US seceded.

From Wikipedia

The actual substance of English law was formally "received" into the United States in several ways. First, all U.S. states except Louisiana have enacted "reception statutes" which generally state that the common law of England (particularly judge-made law) is the law of the state to the extent that it is not repugnant to domestic law or indigenous conditions.[20] Some reception statutes impose a specific cutoff date for reception, such as the date of a colony's founding, while others are deliberately vague.[21] Thus, contemporary U.S. courts often cite pre-Revolution cases when discussing the evolution of an ancient judge-made common law principle into its modern form,[21] such as the heightened duty of care traditionally imposed upon common carriers.[22]

I interpret that to mean that the Magna Carta itself is not US law, but the judical decisions that resulted from the document are. But then, I don't even qualify as an armchair lawyer, so consult your own legal representative before oppressing the serfs.

Comment Re:Sounds like the principle behind URNs (Score 1) 153

I see no reason why HTTP can't be a high level URN, ala urn:http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3032489&cid=40907233
Whatever URN lookup happens, it will probably resolve to URLs anyway. urn:isbn:0451450523 resolves to urn:http://www.loc.gov/isbn/0451450523, then a list of alternates like urn:http://www.amazon.com/isbn/0451450523

Comment Re:It's easy to spoof (Score 2) 346

Email has never been secure. It is very similar to postal mail; you can write whatever return address on the envelop that you want.

Yes, there have been some suggestions lately to improve this. The postal equivalent of comparing the return address's zipcode and the originating post fffice's zipcode, and marking that ones that don't match as "likely spam". It's not ubiquitous, and it's just extra points in the spam scoring.

Comment Re:Not getting RDMS (Score 1) 283

When interacting with the data from outside the database, you use a view, which can be engineered to appear to contain NULLs, duplicate rows, and so forth.

One of the base tenants of relational theory is that a view is indistinguishable from a base table. You can take 2 tables and make a view using them. Or you can flip it around, have a single base table and 2 views that resemble the original tables. Both methods are equally valid, and a user querying the data can't tell the difference.

Until you outlaw NULLs in base tables. Now base tables and views are not interchangable.

I agree that NULLs shouldn't be stored in a table, but I also believe that I should be allowed to hurt myself if I really want to. I don't want to do it, but it's just too slow to do it the correct way. So I compromise now, submit a bug report, and revisit when performance improves. And future-me swears at past-me for doing it.

Education

Automated Dorm Room Causes a School Inquiry 170

First time accepted submitter ElectronicHouseGrant writes "Freshman Derek Low rigged up his Berkeley dorm room with something he calls B.R.A.D., which is short for 'Berkeley Ridiculously Automated Dorm.' The room includes automated lighting, drapes, music, motion detection, and more. He can control everything through voice recognition, but a wireless remote, his iPhone and his iPad are also in on the control party. Derek started the install on February 4 and finished just a few days ago."

Comment Re:Well that and if your lucky like I am (Score 1) 380

The tv signal is there no matter what. Stealing isn't the right word to describe what he's doing. Breach of contract is probably more appropriate.

Most cable companies are required to carry the Over The Air channels on the same channel numbers. It's generally part of the local monopoly contract the municipality negotiates with the cable company. If his contract says he can't watch those channels, it's probably unenforcable. A fine example of clauses companies put in contracts, assuming you don't know your legal rights.

Data Storage

Ask Slashdot: How Do You Manage Your Personal Data? 414

New submitter multimediavt writes "Ok, here's my problem. I have a lot of personal data! (And, no, it's not pr0n, warez, or anything the MPAA or RIAA would be concerned about.) I am realizing that I need to keep at least one spare drive the same size as my largest drive around in case of failure, or the need to reformat a drive due to corrupt file system issues. In my particular case I have a few external drives ranging in size from 200 GB to 2 TB (none with any more than 15 available), and the 2 TB drive is giving me fits at the moment so I need to move the data off and reformat the drive to see if it's just a file system issue or a component issue. I don't have 1.6 TB of free space anywhere and came to the above realization that an empty spare drive the size of my largest drive was needed. If I had a RAID I would have the same needs should a drive fail for some reason and the file system needed rebuilding. I am hitting a wall, and I am guessing that I am not the only one reaching this conclusion. This is my personal data and it is starting to become unbelievably unruly to deal with as far as data integrity and security are concerned. This problem is only going to get worse, and I'm sorry 'The Cloud' is not an acceptable nor practical solution. Tape for an individual as a backup mechanism is economically not feasible. Blu-ray Disc only holds 50 GB at best case and takes forever to backup any large amount of data, along with a great deal of human intervention in the process. So, as an individual with a large data collection and not a large budget, what do you see as options for now (other than keeping a spare blank drive around), and what do you see down the road that might help us deal with issues like this?"

Slashdot Top Deals

Computer Science is merely the post-Turing decline in formal systems theory.

Working...