The experiment was a success. The outcome a failure.

There are two proposed approaches for fusion power generation: tokamak and ICF. ITER tests the tokamak approach and the National Ignition Facility tests the ICF approach. Thanks to the NIF we now know exactly what ICF is and isn't capable of. I'd call that an excellent return on investment.

The question is not "why do some people act like fucktards online?". Deep down, fucktards is exactly what those people are. They just hide it better in real life.

The humans delved too greedily and too deep. You know what they awoke in the darkness of Khazad-dum... shadow and flame.

Even then it still won't work.

Anytime you have a headphone jack I can just play the play and record it on a second computer.
Anytime you have a DVI/HDMI jack I can just play the video and re-encode it on a second computer.

A little too rich for my blood. Someone come up with a DIY version and put it on kickstarter. As long as you have put an Arduino in there it'll sell like hotcakes.

How else are you going warn everyone about the theater fire?

Justice Holmes' exact words were " falsely shouting fire in a theater". Please get it right next time.

Comparing a FOSS game engine and a close-source one, isn't that comparing apples and oranges?

If he's making money he's an industrialist.

If he's not then he's a philanthropist.

I think GP is merely arguing the word choice that's all.

Not for long though. I hear it's being off-shored to China already.

Why bother with the intercom at all? Just get a dozen cheap MP3 players and give each passenger one. Everyone pick their own song. The sound quality is better because they're all listening from the earphone instead of the intercom. Less distraction to the pilot as well.

$99 per year.

Why would the terrorists go through all that trouble? Just book first class and use the complimentary metal knifes. The 9/11 guys didn't need any fancy schmancy liquid explosives; all they used was just knifes.

The phone numbers wasn't released for privacy reasons. What was released (if you bother to click the link) was the UDID, APNS Token, and device name. I really don't see how a randomly generated list can match both the UDID and corresponding device name.

It's been publicly verified. Since the data is public, any iOS user can see if their device is on the list or not.

This whole discussion is moot if it's just junk data. Whether FBI, Anonymous, or some other party collected the data, its very creation means that laws were broken.

Wait, so you're saying there's a con man out there who pretends to be an FBI agent and he somehow has the personal information of a million iPhone owners?