Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Right...just change the "acceptable level"! (Score 3, Interesting) 536

Thank you. I really don't mean to sound like a dick but if you are worried about this I just want to ask these questions rather than spending the time to seek out the data myself. I have no opinion either way on nuclear power. Once again I completely realize repeatedly asking these questions is making me seem hostile, but I am not trying to be like that.

It is common for definitions of vague concepts like "irregular" to change over time. Has that occurred in this case? Why have the researchers failed to use a parametric approach (ie quantify "how irregular")? Why is the term used "irregular" rather than one that more strongly implies damaging to health?

How does the sampling strategy of children's thyroid glands differ between before fukushima and after?

Comment Re:Because science is boring (Score 1) 536

You know this, I know this, the "media" knows this. They know that radiation is scarier than water, and that scarier things get more eyeballs... so they run with that story. People need to learn that the purpose of the news is not to inform, but to get you watching commercials.

I don't see how that is a rebuttal. (maybe it wasn't meant to be).

Comment Re:Good luck with that! (Score 1) 361

The other thing is that one of these times the dollar won't withstand the crisis. That time will be when you were (probably) happy to have commodities or other actual valuable items and skills rather than stock. For the record I currently hold no gold but could probably be persuaded to buy a bit (probably coins) on a big enough dip.

Comment Re:Good luck with that! (Score 2) 361

http://i48.tinypic.com/30953e1.png
Note that most data begins at 1980. Also note zirp since 2008.

Most data from here (I am not sure about the methods but its from government...):
http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?ap

Gold and FFR is from elsewhere, I had it sitting around but I'm sure you can easily check to verify. Data from pre-1980 is harder to find. If you have a good source I would love to know it. To me it looks like the price of gold was being suppressed and it is just now catching up with everything else. In other words the volatility in gold is the result of manipulation.

Slashdot Top Deals

One good reason why computers can do more work than people is that they never have to stop and answer the phone.

Working...