Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Awesome (Score 1) 345

In those heady days when MythVodka was working with minimal jiggering, the quality of the Hulu streams wouldn't make you forget OTA -- but it was more than sufficient for me to finish out the season of Burn Notice after I canceled TV service from Comcast. No reptilians. Some pixelation in fast-moving scenes, but the quality was better than you'd think.

Best of all, I save $70 a month and got to watch stuff quickly, conveniently, and legally. There's no way Comcast was going to put up with that for long...
Games

Dealing With Fairness and Balance In Video Games 192

MarkN writes "Video games are subject to a number of balance issues from which traditional games have largely stayed free. It can be hard finding players of comparable skill-level to create even match-ups, diverse gameplay options can quickly become irrelevant if someone finds a broken feature that beats everything else, and some online games make your ability to play competitively a question of how much time and money you've invested in a game, rather than the skill you possess. In this article, I talk about some of the issues relating to fairness and balance in games, in terms of the factors and strategies under the player's control, the game's role in potentially handicapping players, and the role a community of gamers plays in setting standards for how games are to be played. What are your thoughts on managing a 'fair and balanced' gaming experience?"

Comment Re:Oh yeah... It is time for action (Score 2, Insightful) 434

OMG incompetent guvmunt can't do nuthin right, right?

I'm so sick of this argument, especially as it relates to health care. We pay more and get less in return than the citizens in dozens of other countries. The difference? People in other countries ceded some and varying levels of control of health care -- a basic human necessity -- to an entity without a profit motive.

No amount of anecdotal "waiting lists" or complaints about phantom lawsuits driving up costs can change the objective fact, which is that we're being ripped off by the existing private system. It has failed to expand the reach of care, to control costs or to improve the health of the nation. Yet we continue to fall for idiotic "government can't do anything right" arguments despite all the real-world examples of governments that are succeeding in keeping their populations healthy while spending less per capita.

Comment Re:Sub $500? (Score 1) 335

I guess it depends on your cable company, but Comcrap in Minneapolis has SA set-top boxes for digital cable that have active Firewire ports, and I was able to record everything -- including HD channels -- that wasn't pay TV (e.g., HBO) via MythTV. Until I ditched the cable, anyway. It was highly reliable with the latest Knoppmyth, and didn't tie up a tuner.

Comment Re:What is still in the bill? (Score 1) 658

Think of it as a time-release capsule. All the medicine doesn't hit the body at the same time.

For infrastructure projects, yes -- it'll take some time for the jackhammers to hit the concrete. But there are a lot of things that lead up to that, including architectural design, material processing and procurement, real estate procurement, and other spending related to planning.

It's also a psychological boost for many industries. What's going on right now, even at my company, is prophylactic layoffs. People are losing their jobs because companies think things are going to be worse this year. If companies know that spending is coming, more people might keep their jobs. The calculus here is more than just $X per new job -- with more than half a million people put out of work last month, a job saved in this economy is about as good as a job created.

There's another thing that bugs me about all this talk about infrastructure and "pork" in the stimulus. In the last 8 years, we've ended up more than $8 trillion in the hole. What do we have to show for it? At least it seems like the stimulus is aimed at getting us either direct "stuff" or on the road to long-term changes in things like energy production that we should have started in 2001.

Comment Re:Don't want to pay (Score 2, Insightful) 538

I generally agree, but the microwave has some advantages:

1) Your chocolate is a lot less likely to seize in the microwave than a double boiler.

2) Rice is a breeze in the microwave, and you don't have to worry about scorching (unless your microwave is hideously overpowered).

3) Microwave popcorn delivers consistently better results than popping kernels in oil on the stove.

4) Microwave an egg in the right sized ramekin and you've got your breakfast sandwich filling ready faster than you can toast your english muffin.

5) There's no way to use a conventional oven to make Peeps explode.

Slashdot Top Deals

MESSAGE ACKNOWLEDGED -- The Pershing II missiles have been launched.

Working...