Ok cool, so you've unchecked the "Automatically install updates" option and everyone's happy again?

Do you also verify where every debit card reader is physically connected, and audit that none of the electronics are malicious and skimming your data? link

Ok then, they're about as similar as a Hamster and a Ham

They're about as similar as a Car and a Carpet

Why not just pipe that request to Google and return the text at the top?

I think you should double check Google's terms and conditions for automated access

Why is one prioritized over the other[]?

Uh, because it's a linear listing - which means that one has to appear first, and the other afterwards? Do you think that all results should be displayed side-by-side?

Or, if you accept that search results have to appear in *some* order, how do you expect Google to know that you're planning a trip and not writing a school paper? Should Google be able to work out where you live, find the nearest schools, look up the History lesson plans and see that you've got a Chinese politics essay to hand in; or alternatively should it work out the median wage where you live and determine how likely it is that you'll be travelling to China?

Or, should it just wait for you to add *one extra word* to the search to clarify what you want, and decide for itself what most people are looking for if you're not that specific?

- would cost a lot of money to build
- has no way of reconciling that cost

Every word was accurate? So you actually *do* love handing your information over?

The paper from two years ago mentions the problem in relation to

the U.K.'s Orange and Canada's Rogers Wireless

and not in relation to O2. Had they been involved 2 years ago, I would have expected them to be named in that original paper.

Hint: In parts of the video you hear a tappy-tappy sound as he navigates around the media centre.

A music CD is as useful to you as a blank CD-R? Then I assume you buy and listen to a lot of blank CDs? If not, it would seem you attribute some kind of value to the music content.

Sure, but the question isn't "Why do you want to *work*?", it's "Why do you want to work *here*?"

The answer isn't designed to find out whether you need money at the moment, but why that particular position is the one you're after. Now in most cases that just changes your answer from "Because I need a paycheck" to "Because you guys were the first people who offered me an interview", and that's fine.

But if you're an interviewer and you have to choose between two people, one who answers "Because you're the only people who'll talk to me" and one who answers "Because your output seems interesting and your public image seems like somewhere I'd fit in" - who do you think would be more likely to be productive?

You do realise that the patent is for a *method* of switching to apps during a phone call, not the *concept* of switching to apps during a phone call? Since the iPhone doesn't have a Ctrl or a Backspace key, that's probably not the method they're patenting

I have.

</counter-anecdote>

Except, Adobe AIR is a viable way of packaging an Flash app for deployment via the Apple App Store