Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Poll - Will Ferrell on Wired Magazine cover was...

Ollabelle writes: Will Ferrell's appearance on the cover of Wired Magazine was:
1) brilliant
2) stupid
3) who's Will Ferrell?

See the Rants Section in the October magazine (18.10, page 23) as the inspiration of this poll

Comment Re:more importantly (Score 1) 366

I've had similar problems with Flash. I'm in management in Accounting, and I was kindly given a very nice laptop from the IT department to test drive ahead of the masses. It's worked fine... until I allow Flash to run, and then the laptop quickly develops a runaway heat problem. The only solution is to turn it off (a long exercise since all the processes start firing simultaneously, presumably because of the heat), flip it over, and rest a sealed soda can on it above the CPU until the beast cools down.

Flash-Block is the only thing that saves this machine, but whether it's a Flash or a Firefox-Flash issue, I'm not sure.

Comment Misleading (Score 3, Interesting) 142

And for long did they know the prize was already won and everyone else had zero chance to win? That's the part that bothers me.

I remember a similar situation with Virginia's scratch-off lottery tickets: a fixed number of tickets are printed with winning numbers, and once those prizes are all claimed, the Lottery Agency is supposed to pull the remaining tickets since they're all losers. But of course, they don't.

Comment Satellites (Score 1) 377

Try coordinating your location with http://www.heavens-above.com/. They track lots (all?) the satellites and large debris, including some cool tumbling ones, so maybe you can find something there. They track the flares that come from reflections off solar panels too, but I've had no luck to seeing them using their location data.

Only problem I foresee is that with a 4" telescope, unless there's some kind of tracking mechanism, regardless of what you're looking at, cycling through a bunch of kids will be difficult as the object/detail in question will have moved and the telescope will need to be constantly re-pointed. THAT will be the toughest part in my opinion. You can reduce the problem by paying close attention to the pivoting mechanisms on the telescope (possibly with some dry runs without the kids) so that the one axis points to celestial north and the other along the celestial plane. If you're tracking the moon or Jupiter, then a turn of only one of the knobs (this thing does have a tracking mechanism, right?) will keep it in the scope.

Cue the piling on as I'm sure my description is un-artful and /. is an unforgiving crowd.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff." -- Dave Enyeart

Working...