What?!!! A Slashdot summary was wrong? A sensationalist headline was wrong? No one did any fact checking?!!!! Inconceivable!
This is why Slashdot (News for Nerds) is "news" like Fox News is "news" - it's not. There's no journalistic ethics applied. It's entertainment and maybe occasionally informational.
Insects are mostly sterilized with radiation
What could possibly go wrong?
but the question still remains. Does his ruling make sense?
No, the question is, is the moratorium illegal. Not, does it make sense economically, or, is it fair, or, is it logical. Those are not the questions the judge should be deciding. Judges rule on what the law is, so I ask, what law did Obama break when he initiated the moratorium?
I am sorry if I seem to misunderstand something, but... who are you?
Not sure how to answer that. I prefer my limited privacy.
And who gave you "+3, Insightful"?
No clue.
Yes. They buy a search term, to try and put a spin on the news. Of course this is irritating. And no, we're not interested in news from them as we know that they have a very large and currently exceptionally busy PR department, making news from them quite worthless.
Again, sorry if I seem paranoid or something, but... who are you? I keep finding very positive entries, protecting BP, writing positively about them. Seems a bit weird, especially seeing that they're trying to keep 3rd-person data away from this.
I'm a computer programmer, not a BP employee or apologist. I just think this whole story is upside down. I'm a skeptic by nature and although I love Slashdot I hate groupthink and a lot of Slashdot postings qualify as groupthink in my opinion. I think it's appalling what BP has done to the Gulf, but if I was a responsible company I would do just what they are doing with the Google ads.
On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.