Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Nonsense (Score 1) 327

Sure it does. "This is the address bar. This part is the hostname. 'http' means you're in danger, 'https' means there's a bit less danger, a green bar with the name of the company you're trying to do business with means there's even less." "Don't open unexpected email attachments, no matter how much free porn they promise." "If the lights on your modem are always on even when you're not using the computer, get the computer looked at by a professional."

This is the idea. Not so much computer "driver's license", as computer "driver's ed."

Google

Submission + - Google to release Linux based ChromeOS (tech-no-media.com)

erlik writes: "The blogosphere is aflame with news that Google finally decided to go after Microsoft and release it's own Linux based Operating System targeted at netbooks: ChromeOS. The frenzy was started by a post on the official Google blog were Sundar Pichai announced the new OS. But is it really a new OS? I don't think so! Complete story"

Comment Re:This reads like electoral interference to me (Score 5, Informative) 512

Also, if the protesters have to rely on Twitter uptime ... They're pretty much screwed.

Does Twitter need to introduce the "Fail Camel" to not alienate the Iranian population?

Just to clarify, Iran is a mountainous and largely forested country inhabited neither by Arabs nor Arabic speakers.

Comment Over what time? That is the question. (Score 1) 290

The average visitor to YouTube is costing Google between one and two dollars [...]

Over what time? In total?
Because I'd have no problem, paying $2 a year for YouTube. Even more, if most of it goes straight to the creators of the videos I'm watching, and the videos are in the uploaded quality (up to full-HD). Kutiman alone would be worth that.

I'm all for micro-payment. Sounds fair to me. And they would make good money off of it, while supporting artist directly. (As long as they do not do it like the old media industry, and take 96.5% for themselves, and then still expect the artists to pay for the studio and everything... off of that money.)

Comment Re:Sure it would. (Score 1) 518

I believe they are "captured." Except for pawns. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to "redeem" one of the pieces with a pawn.

Just FYI, the piece you place does not have to have been previously captured. This is the reason a lot of sets of pieces come with two Queens.
How this affects the analogy, I have no idea...

Comment Re:Lojban (Score 5, Insightful) 369

... these are the same people who believe that a computer can "think" about chess, instead of just searching through N number of plies in T time, then offering the best solution it has found in those constraints...

Who says that this is insufficient for "thinking"?

I think understanding the Chinese room paradox as having provided a solution to this question is a misinterpretation. The best thing to take away is that "thinking" is not well defined.

Slashdot Top Deals

Happiness is twin floppies.

Working...