Comment Re:Odd lighting issues (Score 1) 287
I think it was bloom in the higher exposure version.
I think it was bloom in the higher exposure version.
When you make your film around your budget, sure you can make it cheap.. and sometimes even the film that the producers wanted to make. Usually though, you end up with something like those made for SyFy movies.
Personally I'd rather have film makers make what they think is going to be GOOD. And that is not always cheap.
Hey, if you think that you can consistently make great movies comparable to even the mid-rate movies out today for $15k, please, get off Slashdot and go do it, I'll gladly give you my $10.
Why is this insightful? You have clearly never worked on or tried to make a film. Besides the fact that this is not a movie that rely on big names or mega effects beyond what helped to further the story. $15M is cheap for a movie that will meet what modern audiences expect for production values. Every minute of a film is hours of production time. When you consider how many people go into a shoot, the cost of decent cinema quality equipment, travel and shipping costs, costume (you still have to buy it), location scouting and logistics, insurance, etc etc.
I'm not trying to defend the actions of this producer, I think this is all very unfortunate, but you are really foolish if you think that every movie can be made for a few thousand dollars.
Well, you have to admire that the biggest online advertising corporation on the internet didn't pull out the ad blocking feature on it's own brand of webkit browser. Yes, Google is a corporation like any other, but at least they have a little respect for not pissing it's costumers off. I think a lot of companies in the same position would have made it so their browser ADDED ads.
"IMAX Digital" uses two 2k Christie cinema projectors. Real IMAX would of course blow away 2k and frankly probably 4k as well.
From what I recall it runs around $22k (list). It's a very nice, compact box, but it is not as cheap as using consumer set-top boxes with a decent quality modulator like from http://www.blondertongue.com/ and it sounds like the GP is looking for something on a budget. Also as far as I know that box only works for clear to air channels, which unfortunately may not work with anything other then local stations on many cable providers.
I've never had one, but being a trumpet player I can tell you you could indeed play a tune on a Vuvuzela. Early trumpets didn't have valves at all, they were quite long (an octave lower) so that it could be played in it's upper register. In those upper registers many notes will resonate in the horn without needing to change it's length with the valves. We still see this in the bugle.
A simple youtube search turns up this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gjjLhQTufg&feature=related
I never understood that comic. You couldn't get that high of resolution content outside of owning a 35mm print until we had high definition distribution mechanisms like blu-ray. Why shouldn't that be exciting?
Large displays used to be many times the overall size and cost, why shouldn't that be impressive?
I own a Dell U2711 but we still watch movies around the house on my roommate's Epson 8500UB. Resolution isn't the only factor in what makes a good watching experience.
More importantly, to make yellow you have to emit Red and Green light. Well the problem is, that the Green component is futher into the blue cone then yellow would be.
To put it another way, yellow coming from a red and green source is causing more response from the blue retna then a true yellow wavelength would, making the color look more 'washed out'.
RGB us a good way to fool the eye, but if you are thinking you are seeing all the colors that the eye is capable of perceiving, you would be wrong. This is why companies like Pantone exist. It is simply impossible to replicate every color with any kind of three or four color process, either additive or subtractive. Yet we can still perceive the difference in those colors.
Seriously, will this
It's worse then that even, they can't even decide what they mean. I've seen WXGA mean 1366x768, 1280x768, 1280x800, and 1280x720. I have even seen a projector that had a resolution that was a 17:10 aspect ratio. It probably wouldn't even bother me that much, except that many times, the only thing listed in the spec sheet is "WXGA" with no actual resolution listed.
Physician: One upon whom we set our hopes when ill and our dogs when well. -- Ambrose Bierce