Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Parking tickets (Score 1) 291

Tickets for parking too long in one spot should be accompanied by proof that you did exceed the time, including photos showing the wheels in the same position at the start time and stop time.

It sounds like a good trick around the system, but in reality the laws have been designed to prevent this type of gaming.

In my area, let's say you park in a metered block that's signed as "1 hour maximum, 8 AM to 5 PM".

The law is written such that you can't park in that ENTIRE BLOCK for more than 1 hour between 8 AM and 5 PM. Your 1 hour timer starts from the very first moment your car is parked in that block within the restricted hours.

So if you drive into a space at 10 AM, park for 10 minutes, drive off, and come back at noon and park in the same block for another 10 minutes, you've broken the law. Because your parking time in that block was from 10 AM until 11 AM. Re-feeding the meter doesn't help - it isn't about the money, it's about sharing the space with others. This is called "overtime", and it's different than no time left on the meter.

And of course, the meter readers carry digital ticket-generating radio devices with digital cameras and tag (plate) readers in them, so there is a good possibility that you get caught. Yes, I've gotten several tickets for overtime, and although I was unhappy with the tickets, it wasn't as if I didn't breaking the law. The real bummer is getting a ticket for both Overtime and Expired Meter on the same ticket... that's TWO distinct fines. (They used to use chalk to mark tire position, but that doesn't work well if it rains, or if the parker knows enough to rub the chalk away.)

The laws are very well defined to minimize gaming the system. They generally impact people like me who try to park for 8 hours at two hour meters.

Plus, it's pretty hard to argue in court: here's a guy with a half-dozen parking tickets filed against him, versus a meter maid who gets the most verbal abuse in the world and who doesn't have a care in the world if you pay the fine or not. The judge is most likely believe the person who is just doing their job and who doesn't have the incredibly bad parking record. As it should be.

Comment Look for more... cash. (Score 1) 675

Obviously, you have some capabilities that they can't do without. You should be able to capitalize on that.

Tell them that you can be put on a retainer, so, for a nominal fee (maybe triple your new hourly salary), you will help them out for up to 8 hours a week - either by helping them with particular projects, training new people, bringing management up to speed, or whatever. Also, require them to give you a stellar written review on company letterhead.

They are being assholes - I've never heard of such a thing. Generally, in my experience, the employer entices the employee to stay by offering a higher salary, bonus, upgraded position, or other perks. Badmouthing employees (or employers) is generally an awful strategy.

But don't get mad. Scratch their itch by giving them what they need and by getting a lot out of it yourself.

Robotics

Submission + - Will you one day marry a robot?

Roland Piquepaille writes: "David Levy, a British artificial intelligence researcher and international chess master, defended on Thursday his Ph.D. thesis at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands. The name of his thesis is "Intimate Relationships with Artificial Partners" and the University announced it in a very short news release under the name "Love and Sex with Robots." Levy says that trends in robotics and artificial intelligence will, 'within a few decades, result in robots that are so humanlike in their appearance and functionality, in their personality, and in their expression of emotions, that many people will be falling in love with them, having sex with them, and even marrying them.' Will it really happen? Are you ready for this? Read more for additional details and a picture of the cover of Levy's book to come, also named 'Love and Sex with Robots.'"
Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft retracts Patent

Anonymous Coward writes: "Here is something you don't see very often, if ever, and it was done by Microsoft, nonetheless: they have retracted a patent application. The story was first brought to light by Slashdot on Saturday. Today, Jane Prey of Microsoft announced on the SIGCSE (Special Interest in Computer Science Education) mailing list: "Many thanks to the members of the community that brought this to my attention — and here's the latest. The patent application was a mistake and one that should not have happened. To fix this, Microsoft will be removing the patent application. Our sincere apologies to Michael Kölling and the BlueJ community. Jane Prey.""
Security

Submission + - Microsoft study finds EV SSL Certs are ineffective

An anonymous reader writes: Stanford University and Microsoft Research published a study [PDF] that concludes that Extended Validation Certificates do not help users to detect phishing attacks. Without training, most users in the study did not notice the new EV indicators in IE7. Training only increased their vulnerability- reading the IE7 help file made users more likeley to classify phishing sites as legitimate. This study arrives just as the first EV certificates are being rolled out. The authors will present their results at Usable Security 2007 in February.
Encryption

Interview with Developer of BackupHDDVD 223

An anonymous reader writes "HD DVD and Blu-Ray were supposedly protected by an impenetrable fortress. However a programmer named "muslix64" discovered that this was not the case, and released BackupHDDVD. Now, Slyck.com has an interview with the individual responsible, who provides some interesting insight to his success."
Communications

Submission + - Say farewell to Dash and Dot

livnah writes: At WRC-03 in 2003 the International Telecommunications Union made the decision to "delegates agreed to authorize each country to determine whether or not to require that applicants demonstrate Morse code proficiency in order to qualify for an Amateur Radio license with privileges on frequencies below 30 MHz", effectively putting an end to the Morse Code Requirement worldwide. It took until today for the FCC (United States Federal Communications Commission, which oversees radio licensing in the US and it's territories) to formally announce that "23 February 2007 [will be] when the current 5 WPM Morse code requirement will officially disappear from the Amateur Radio Service Part 97 rules". The article from the ARRL goes on to say: "After midnight on that date, applicants for a General or Amateur Extra class Amateur Radio license no longer will have to demonstrate proficiency in Morse code. They'll just have to pass the applicable written examination. The appearance in today's Federal Register of the FCC's Report and Order (R&O) in the "Morse code proceeding," WT Docket 05-235, starts a 30-day countdown for the new rules to become effective. Deletion of the Morse requirement — still a matter of controversy within the amateur community — is a landmark in Amateur Radio history."

Slashdot Top Deals

Be careful when a loop exits to the same place from side and bottom.

Working...