It's not about debt or anything that complicated. Just restoring regulations THAT WE HAD YEARS AGO would help immensely
Yeah, the Government should decide how we listen to music. They sure have had some great ideas about Internet privacy. Power to the government! Sorry I couldn't resist a little snark
I'm unconvinced. Myself, I'd rather not have regulation that says we need to regulate the Internet like a series of tubes. How about, we all just listen/buy the stuff we like, and ignore the lame? It's not like we don't have literally millions of entertainment sources. When you involve regulation and Government you get the politicians and Big Money involved. I don't think those guys have our best interests at heart...
>When they develop also develop the antidote or cure.
No released research = no cure.
Your move.
-- BMO
Zero Day Exploit that KILLS PEOPLE.
Your Move.
Something tells me that this wasn't designed by a teenager.
Arguably, yes it was. According to the NYT, it was designed under George Bush.
It would make a crazy sort of sense, yes? If Angry Birds was actually malware...
Or if Fox News wanted to pick a popular application that a significant portion of the human race has heard of. Nope, it must be because Fox News is STOOOPID.
I guess since they are anarchists, when they are caught we can just forget all the usual mumbo jumbo about rights and privileges shoot them on the spot?
Unfortunately they have 'eco' in their class description. Therefore normal rules of science politics. And no, you can't shoot 'em...
The only problem with that is that he's with the Tea Party, which kind of blows a hole in your argument.
How is that a problem if more engineers join the decision making process after being duly elected? Perhaps you prefer lawyers?
China is growing quickly, but it's because they have a lot of room to grow. Once you have a developed economy, it's hard to wring the same kind of growth out of it, because you're a lot closer to your potential.
Hear Hear!
The next round, will be played in space.
Cheers!
Fox is demonstrably more biased than any of those other other stations. Only a liar would say otherwise.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I love the Interwebs! But you said demonstrably more biased, then accused anyone not sharing your opinion of lying. By all means, please demonstrate how Fox is more biased than say, MSNBC. You might even convince me. I would be more receptive to your arguments, however, if you hadn't described voicing an alternate opinion as lying. Opinions can be wrong, but they can't be lies.
You must realize that the computer has it in for you. The irrefutable proof of this is that the computer always does what you tell it to do.