Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Star Trek (Score 2) 511

I would say that Star Trek is classic science fiction, while star wars is a space western . . . the action flick rather than an examination of the human condition.

Wow. Star Trek was designed, pitched, and produced as a space western. IIRC, Roddenberry called it "Wagon Train to the stars."

I'd have to exactly and precisely disagree with you -- Star Trek is a space western, Star Wars is classic science fiction.

Comment Re:Replay attack? (Score 1) 128

From TFA:

With these mobile car apps, the phone connects to a server that then sends secret numerical keys to the car in order to authenticate itself,

So the combination is... one, two, three, four, five? That's the stupidest combination I've ever heard in my life! The kind of thing an idiot would have on his luggage!

Comment Re:guilty eh? (Score 1) 964

... That fact that his IP address was the offending IP Address was enough probable clause for an Arrest Warrant.

Not remotely.

But was it sufficient for a search warrant (which seems to be more on point than an arrest warrant)? That is, if the cops have reason to believe that a particular location (without regard to any person) is involved in illegal activity, is that sufficient to search that location? And, can we agree that IP number and ISP DHCP log files provide a reason to believe that a particular location is involved?

Comment Re:Why would Fake Steve Jobs worry? (Score 2) 217

Just because it's known to be satire doesn't mean that you're not going to be found to be harming somebody.

Yes, it does mean precisely that. RTFA.

[Section 528.5(a)]: ... any person who knowinglly and without consent credibly impersonates another actual person through or on an Internet Web site or by other electronic means for purposes of harming, intimidating, threatening, or defrauding another person is guilty of a public offense ...

[Section 528.5(b)]: For purposes of this section, an impersonation is credible if another person would reasonably believe, or did reasonably believe, that the defendant was or is the person who was impersonated.

So, no, if it is known to be satire, then you cannot be guilty of this particular offense.

Comment Works in business, too! (Score 1) 330

In the 80's I worked for a small (~ 40 person) software company. Back then all software was sold in boxes, with each box having a unique serial number.

The president of the company (I'll call him 'Richard', since that was his name) was sort of a nerd, and he liked to play head games. First, he bought one box / quarter from each of our competitors. From the (sequential) serial numbers, he could reliably estimate their sales rate. Also, all of our competitors started their serial numbers at 1, so he could estimate everyone's total sales.

Not satisfied at gathering intel on our competitors, Richard decided to plant some false intel of his own. Our serial numbers were strictly increasing, but they were not sequential. Richard could adjust the apparent sales rate of our product by choosing the interval between serial numbers. Also, the first box of each of our products was always serial #8386. And the first version of our products was always 1.4.

It is amazing what you can do with people's unstated assumptions about numbers. When a customer receives version 1.4, serial number 8386, he assumes that he has received a mature product. And when a competitor sees your serial number go from 8400 to 9000, he assumes you have sold 600 boxes.

I'm sorta glad that Richard wasn't a Nazi.

Slashdot Top Deals

Modeling paged and segmented memories is tricky business. -- P.J. Denning

Working...