Maybe some, but if they all had that type of information they wouldn't be telling me that the warranty "is about to expire" since my car is 16 years old. Also I know people that have gotten these calls that don't even own a car.

I'd like to hear your argument that Harris was a "token" pick.

I imagine #1 will certainly help resolve their gender gap issues, and by resolve I mean it will make it abundantly clear why they have them.

If we look at the history of Trump's cabinet appointments, trending towards competency is not the way i would describe it. If anything his appointments became less capable as time went on, the first wave was as good as any, the second was less stellar, and by the end it looked like they were taking whoever applied.

Looking through her other available pictures, it just seems she's not very photogenic. I would wager she looks much better in person, she seems to be one of those people who is always caught in the middle of some expression, with odd results. I sympathize as someone with a similar condition, I look incredibly awkward in photos but perfectly normal on video

I disagree, Cuba is extremely sunny.

It's a shame the headline is what it is, because the article itself is otherwise factual.

The problem is not their politics, it's who they are supporting. It's the action not the motivation that gets them labeled. My question to you would be do you assume anyone who calls them out is a leftist?

None have been as competent or successful as the Trump election coup a few weeks ago

Well, if that was the most "competent or successful" I feel better about the long-term prospects of our nation.

I think we can agree that people that have non-cancerous cells are just virtue signaling

Well, one of the convenient things about selling your product at absurd markups is that you have plenty of room to splurge on quality if you feel like it.

This is completely untrue, S230 does not equal net neutrality. All S230 does is formalize the idea that you as a provider might not be aware of all illegality happening on your system and thus are not responsible for illegal content you are not aware of. If you are aware of it, S230 doesn't protect you at all. Your ideas about enforcing "terms of service" causing a company to be ineligible for protection makes no less sense as the law specifically mentions blocking traffic as a protected activity:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of

(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or

(B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).

Jesus.

If you think that the near simultaneous action by every major US tech company was totally their idea and theirs alone, I really don't know what to tell you.

Could trump organize a coup? Of course not, he can't even staff his cabinet. Does he want a coup? I think he's made his feelings pretty clear.