Comment Re:Solution in extensions (Score 3, Informative) 778
Just sharpen the tip of the tines so they shine. You thought rusty was scary, but rusty but recently sharpened? That gives you a whole extra level to work with.
Just sharpen the tip of the tines so they shine. You thought rusty was scary, but rusty but recently sharpened? That gives you a whole extra level to work with.
People seem to be forgetting that javascript can break a lot of accessibility readers. Everything about HTML, CSS, etc., was about separating content from layout. Javascript shits on that entire model, as does Java, ActiveX, and most other plugins.
That's because it was a shit model. Clear, yes, simple yes, all that useful for doing stuff, not so much.
You seem to forget that HTML, CSS, etc is for webpages, not applications.
If you don't like what HTML, CSS, etc model and want your stuff to behave like an application... then write a fucking application instead!
I'm pretty sure he is bitching about Secure Boot, not UEFI itself.
It's a shim, you probably don't even have to go that far. Think grub legacy - once the stage is loaded and running, it can chainload to anything else.
So you're saying the OEMs can install the keys, but the end-users can't?
We're talking about folks installing Linux - if they could, they would have no problem installing their own keys.
what they can do is sign another piece of secret claiming to belong to you, which is highly visible and obvious.
How so? If you trust them (why bother having them sign if not?) then you would trust the replacement.
Unless you check the KSN or fingerprint every time you establish a connection to be sure it hasn't changed?
Strange, you speak as if "geeks" was a single person and not a wide reaching group of people with vastly varied tendencies.
They took that out to slay the ASCII-art trolls.
Now, instead of just drawing dicks with symbols, they write up grand stories about them instead.
It doesn't have to be proprietary - the only thing that gets you is privacy. Other than that - I'd have to agree with you!
QUESTION! Possibly stupid, because I am a layman when it comes to this stuff.
If cosmic rays get bent all around like this, why do we get such a sensible picture from lower energy stuff around visible light? (radio, infrared, visual, uv) I would expect the lower energy stuff to be even more affected.
Redundancy, redundancy, redundancy.
It does cost to implement, but building in redundancy or even just failover controls shoves that failure rate way down.
I'll point out the FADECs in the F16 - there are two of them and they normally run in parallel. However, if one fails the other can fly the plane safely, just with reduced performance characteristics. That's in a tiny jet - you have plenty of space on the kind of platforms we are thinking about.
This is just a guess, but you're probably not offering enough pay.
DNA-based paternity tests only determine if someone might (or even probably) sired a child, it is not a certainty.
Assuming it wasn't all the same jackass...
If I want to do video or image editing, that shit gets turned off even faster, if I don't just reboot into a real OS.
The sooner all the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find their money. - Ed Bluestone
