[screed that equates a relatively small number of Islamic
fundamentalists with the hundreds of millions of people throughout
the world who practice the Muslim religion]
Here is a quote from the introduction of the 2005 book
Devil's Game: How the US unleashed fundamentalist Islam
by Robert Dreyfuss:
The United States played not with Islam -- that is, the religion,
the traditional, organized system of belief of hundreds of millions
-- but with Islamism. Unlike the faith, with fourteen centuries of
history behind it, Islamism is of a more recent vintage. It is a
political creed with its origins in the late nineteenth century, a
militant, all-encompassing philosophy whose tenets would appear
foreign or heretical to most of the Muslims of earlier ages and that
still appear so to many educated Muslims today. Whether it is
called pan-Islam, or Islamic fundamentalism, or political Islam,
it is an altogether different creature from the spiritual
interpretation of Muslim life as contained in the Five Pillars
of Islam. It is, in fact, a perversion of that religious faith.
That is the mutant ideology that the United States encouraged,
supported, organized, or funded. It is the same one variously
represented by the Muslim Brotherhood, by Ayatollah Khomeini's
Iran, by Saudi Arabia's ultra-orthodox Wahhabism, by Hamas
and Hezbollah, by the Afghan jihadis, and by Osama bin Laden.
As others have said, while some people who claim to be Muslims
attack innocent civilians, so do some people who claim to follow
other faiths or claim to have no faith. Generalizing to the larger
group of all Muslims is extremely counter-productive (unless you
goal is to increase the number of and ferocity of attacks against
innocent civilians in the West). The mechanism for how fear-based
anti-Muslim screeds in the West fuel fundamentalist attacks against
the West was explained in the Adam Curtis documentary series The Power of
Nightmares.
In addition, while nothing can justify attacks against innocent
civilians anywhere in the world -- regardless of the race,
nationality, or religion of the attackers or the victims -- by
ignoring the causes of the attacks, by disavowing any
responsibility for our own actions, and by instead opting for a
fear-based knee-jerk emotional reaction, we only make the situation
worse, not better.
Fear is the mind-killer. Often the purpose of attacks against
innocent civilians is to instill fear and terror. If we drop
our reasoning ability and indulge ourselves in these emotions
then we are feeding the cycle of violence, reprisals, and
incriminations. Over-generalizations, collective blame, xenophobia,
and ignoring the obvious consequences of our own actions just fan
the flames of conflict. They do nothing to quell it.
If you consider the people who perpetrated these attacks to be you
enemy then know your enemy! Certainly avoid aiding and
abetting them by reacting exactly how they want you to react!
Blaming, attacking, or murdering other innocents just because they
share a country, a religion, or a family with people who are
responsible for the attacks fuels the conflict. The problem is
not that group-A is mostly bad and group-B is mostly good by
comparison. The problem is attacking, killing, and even blaming
innocent people. This is happening on both sides of the conflict.
For example, blaming Iraq for the 9/11 attacks led to the war on
Iraq that killed over one hundred thousand innocent civilians
and led to the destabilization of the entire area, the rise of
ISIS and the massive refuge crisis. Absolving ourselves of
any responsibility for the obvious consequences of our actions
and instead continuing on the same path of blaming and punishing
more innocent people will continue to have the same disastrous
consequences.
You have a choice. You can either keep feeding the conflict or you
can work to stop it. Even if your fear-based beliefs were correct
and they are somehow morally worse than us then it
is even more incumbent on us to stop the conflict instead of feeding
it.