you are absolutely right... and it amazes how desperately some folks want to be bamboozled

As you are clearly posting in a position of ignorance let me clear a few things up for you.

1: "Scientific Journal" describes "Nature", it is not the journal's name. It is a peer reviewed international weekly journal of science.
2: They & hundreds of other scientists reviewed the leaked data & correspondence and the published data. They concluded that there is nothing in this stolen data which effects our current understanding of climate science in any way.
3: They also concluded that many people are taking some phrases out of context and insisting that they mean something completely different than the context otherwise indicates. This is what you are doing.
4: Anthropogenic climate change is on going and there is ample evidence of it, even if we were to unfairly discount the work of CRU or the scientists named in this manufactured controversy.
5: That you assert if something was real there would have to be no data analysis or manipulation suggests to me that you have never done any kind of serious scientific investigation... or used a measurement or diagnostic device of any complexity.

I find it fascinating that denailists like yourself express wild fantasies with religious overtones when complaining about science. I also find it interesting how you are so willing to assert conspiracies of gigantic proportions to explain consensus in the scientific community. It's pretty pathetic to see people so divorced from reality.

except the denialists & obstructionists pay better, so if anyone was in the climate science debate for the purely money they'd be writing papers denying or refuting the existing science... and there has been no real scientist publishing real science refuting the current understanding of our climate.

Nature Magazine recently published an editorial "Stolen e-mails have revealed no scientific conspiracy". In fact no credible scientist has made a statement which disagrees with that editorial in any meaningful way. I don't need to defend anything concerning climate change science because there is nothing which challenges the science. So keep grasping at lies & and conspiracy theories. Because those and my typo are all an ignorant fool such as yourself has.

lots of folks are using wave... just use "with:public" and you'll find all kinds of stuff

If speed matters it's cheaper, easier, and faster to buy more processing power.

Your 'point' is is not factually correct. Nothing in the CRU email and data indicates scientists who subscribe to an anthropogenic cause of climate change have not been systematically lying or engaging in unethical practices to support their work. There already are *mountains* of evidence from a huge array of sciences supporting both climate change and an anthropogenic cause. And nothing on Wikileaks invalidates any of the work done at CRU or any other climate research institute.

The reality of all that hoopla is the people doing the agitating had long since decided that not only can the climate not change but even if it did man couldn't possibly have an impact.

Gears / HTML5

Please try to keep up, the mindless poorly reasoned whining about Chrome OS was yesterday.

Probably it's a better idea to wait until there is some sort of Beta release available, instead of this very alpha release.

I have had to testify about this sort thing in a patent lawsuit. The other side had cooked up all sorts of wild confabulations using my lab notebooks.

they did talk up HTML 5

I find it pretty pathetic that comments which misscharacterize things mentioned in the article or in the various links are so highly moderated.

I hear you... hopefully someone will add the feature of being able to have it sync with your desktop. Sort of like the iPhone, Mobile Me, and Back to my Mac. If I could sync my mail with my desktop Mail client; play music from my Library; and access all my photos & documents... then I'd sign up happily. I also would be much happier if my data was encrypted while it transited it's way through the net.

Google isn't pointing this at desktops or workstation. They've said specifically it's for netbooks and smartbooks.

My feeling is that after the disaster that was the Bush Administration the brand name of " Libertarianism" came into vogue... so there are a lot of folks running around calling themselves Libertarians when they actually are not.