Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Bullshit (Score 1) 486

Blame the British and the Balfour Declaration

Oh we fucked it up big time by allowing this to start. That said, we know it was a stupid mistake but there's fuck all we can do about it while America keeps propping up the Israeli position for political reasons rather than do what is needed to bring about something a little bit closer to peace.

Ah, and what do you recommend as a viable peace process when one side declares openly, even in their founding charter, that they won't stop until the other side is dead?

Comment Re:Bullshit (Score 1) 486

Most of modern history in the Middle East results from the UN sticking its fingers where they don't belong, randomly stealing a big chunk of land considered sacred to the natives, and giving it to Israel. "Aww, those mean Germans tried to eradicate you? Here, let's throw a dart at this map and give you... Hmm, yeah, I think I have a call on the other line, good luck with that new home".

If only your ignorant anti-semitic views were the truth. Then it would be easy to dislike Israel. Unfortunately, its not. No land was "stolen" or "given". Jews have lived there since 1200 BCE. That is a very simple, historical, verifiable, fact. The Jews that lived elsewhere on the planet were doing so because they had been kicked out of their ancestral land. Since the time of the Roman Empire, Jews have been trying to return to Israel.

What the Brits/UN did was split up the Ottoman Empire. The Brits gave one piece of that region back to the natives. All the natives; Jews included. They split it into 1 Arab-only area, and 1 Arab/Jewish area. The Arabs have been trying to wipe out the Jews since before Israel even was a nation.

Gee, wonder why they all hate us. Oh, right, for our "freedoms" - Like the freedom to not have someone randomly kick us out of our homes and give them to our ancient enemies.

They do hate us for our freedoms you dumb hippie. Read the Hamas charter. ALL people must live under Sharia law, or die. Here, let me share their slogan. I'm sure you can find ample points of discussion in any peace process with this:

Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its Constitution, Jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief.

Comment Re:Bullshit (Score 1) 486

They fire rockets at you and your family and blow up [kids in] buses

Fixed that for you.

, and you fire tanks and bombs into [military installations built inside] fully built-up and barricaded ([rightfully] by you) [to stop the importation of weapons] residential areas (effectively an open-air prison or, if you will, a ghetto) [after dropping leaflets and warning people of the impending military strike on terrorists operating in the area, detailing "safe zones" the civilians can go to].

Fixed again

In my outsiders' view, that makes you both pretty much equally shitty.

And you look like the elephant man.

Comment Re:Fascist bloodlust (Score 1) 380

But you're not entitled to your own made-up "facts" about Apache pilots hovering over the streets of Baghdad shooting at anything that moves for shits and grins.

Private Joker: Any women or children?
Door Gunner: Sometimes!
Private Joker: How can you shoot women or children?
Door Gunner: Easy! Ya just don't lead 'em so much! Ain't war hell?

Comment Re:Google Police (Score 1) 200

Here's the thing...

The bartender did not own the phone. 'Finders-keepers' is NOT the law.

It is sometimes.

the guy knowingly in possession of property not belonging to him (the lost vs. stolen line gets blurred quickly) could definitely have criminal charges filed against him.

Nope. If there are clues to the real owner, you must make a reasonable attempt to contact the owner and return the property (California penal code section 485). The bartender did. The investigator was a lying dick.

Comment Re:Seriously? That is the question? (Score 1) 632

from 27 CFR 478.41 "(a) Each person intending to engage in business as an importer or manufacturer of firearms or ammunition, or a dealer in firearms shall, before commencing such business, obtain the license required by this subpart for the business to be operated"

Note the word "business". As noted in numerous other posts, if you don't intend to engage in business, it is perfectly lawful to manufacture a firearm for personal use provided that weapon is not prohibited by the National Firearms Act (i.e. any weapon which fires more than 1 round per trigger pull, a grenade launcher or short barreled shotgun)

From 18 U.S.C. (l) : Except as provided in section 925 (d) of this chapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to import or bring into the United States or any possession thereof any firearm or ammunition;
So, I think you're wrong saying it only applies to businesses. Other parts of the law make it clear that the provisions apply to individuals. If you are not licensed to do what you do (in regards to firearms), you're breaking the law.

Comment Seriously? That is the question? (Score 1) 632

The ATF's FAQ on gun manufacturing pops up with a quick google search.

I hear they're the experts on gun laws in the US.

Some useful links garnered from their FAQ:

p.s., I am not a lawyer. I'm just giving google advice, not legal advice.

Slashdot Top Deals

System going down in 5 minutes.

Working...