Comment Re:Impossible (Score 2) 600
I like this comment. It's a microcosm of the problem with trying to argue with people who refuse to accept any scientific findings.
You want studies about the safety of vaccines?
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php...
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php...
http://www.collectionscanada.g...
And even if they DID cause some harm, the lives saved by their use is still worth it.
As for your Expanding Vacuum thingy, because I don't know about it I'm somehow wrong? Instead of trying to explain to me why it's right you insult me? When I try and guess what the hell it is (based on the results of some quick googling) you try and take it as an insult? I don't know if your theory has any testable hypothesis. I said IF it is a variant of string theory, it probably suffers from the same problem as most string theories and isn't taken seriously because it's not testable.
You ain't challenging my beliefs in the slightest. I don't 'believe' in the big bang, or evolution, or that light travels in waves. I've seen evidence for them, studied them some and accept that the best way to describe and interact with the world is set out in the theories we have constructed. These theories are subject to change and improvement. God is absolute, unchanging, and very wrong. Hawking is old, crippled and has a chance of being right, or at least capable of making brilliant observations. I'll take my way any day.