Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Doomed To Fail (Score 2) 644

And yet the differences are stark.

We deny biological differences at our own peril. Even if your goal is to have more women in tech (a goal I don't personally understand but whatever), you're not going to get anywhere without considering all the FACTS (which was James Damore's whole point).

Female employee diversity at Google from 2013 to 2016 was completely flat. Their diversity project was an abject failure. Obviously, there was no glass ceiling. Women just have better things to do that sit on their ass all day coding!

Comment Re:Definitely the problem (Score 2) 644

This is the dumbest post of the day.

The reason there are fewer female geniuses is largely biology. Women are nature's safe bet, while men are the wildcard. Men fill the prisons and somehow I don't hear feminists wining about that!

Also, men have more compartmentalized brains and deal wit stress better (on the whole). This lends itself to a narrow focus on logical problems for extended periods of time.

We also live shorter and less socially active lives. It's not like a career in math or science is the ultimate goal in life FFS!

Comment Re:Google Diversity: now with Cultural Marxism (Score 1) 644

Veterans of GamerGate aren't surprised at all.

This shit goes deep. "Google Ideas" is where all this BS is sprouting from. It's run by social justice activists. Hell, the whole company is run by these crazies now as evidenced by their CEO and the CEO of YouTube.

Comment 'Member when Google... (Score 1) 644

'Member when Google was about making your life easier?

'Member when Google was just a really good search engine?

'Member when Google made tools which were cheap and easy to use?

'Member when Google was focused on making their company valuable and vying for our business?

'Member when Google had competition?

'Member when Google wasn't evil?

I 'member...

Comment Re:Oh puh-leeze. Mussolini? (Score 2) 96

the purpose of the SEC is to protect investors from unscrupulous companies. Do you really want the kinds of markets we had before the SEC was around?

It's irrelevant what the purpose of a law or agency. The only thing that matters is its effect.

Yes, the markets functioned better before the SEC. The real intent of the SEC is to make sure you're not allowed to invest in competing financial instruments and to make investors completely and utterly gullible.

Slashdot Top Deals

Congratulations! You are the one-millionth user to log into our system. If there's anything special we can do for you, anything at all, don't hesitate to ask!

Working...