I had neither of those 50 years ago.
You didn't have a gun 50 years ago either. You're well aware that I was using the collective "you" in that statement.
Liberals support a vast police power over individuals.
Say what? Its one hell of an extrapolation to claim that say, Sweden (pretty liberal) and North Korea (vast police power) are somehow even remotely similar.
Why do we have to submit to the gun control police
For the same reason you have to submit to the "car control police" or the "food safety police" (if you work in a restaurant.) Any time you have the power to injure or kill people, there should be some sort of check on that power to balance it out.
the historical sex police
You tell me. I'm not the conservative here. I fully support people expressing their sexual desires in any form they like providing its consensual. And its definitely not "historical." There are plenty of states with anti-sodomy laws on file. Trump himself has made specific attacks against transgender individuals. There's continual attacks on gay and lesbian folk. Never mind when you get into things like abortion rights. That's all happening right now, every day in the US. Its hardly "historical."
Why don't liberals stop bullying people
Say what? I'm not sure how you construe "we need to stop letting our kids get killed" as "bullying."
Conservatives have (mostly) stopped
Yeah. Conservatives are all perfectly nice to the Muslim community, the Mexican community, the LBGTQ community, etc.
"Denouncing" is free speech.
Yes. So?
Liberals denounce whites and Christians
We denounce bigoted asshats. The fact that most of the bigoted asshats in the US happen to be white Christians is coincidence. We'd just as quickly denounce say, a Myanma Buddhist if they were being a bigoted jerk. Of course conservatives like to read the liberal disgust over the Rohingyan genocide as "loving Muslims" rather than what it actually is -- denouncing hatred in _all_ its forms.
try to divide us all the time
Now you've run into a bit of a problem. On one hand, you have the bigots who are intentionally trying to divide us. On the other, you're that denouncing the bigots divides the bigots from the rest of us. There's one big difference though: Bigots can learn to be less hateful but black people can't learn to change their skin color and gay people can't change what shape of genitalia turn them on.
You should stop defending the bad guys
When did I do that? Unless of course your definition of "bad guys" is gay people, Muslims, etc who have done nothing wrong beyond not being like you. If that's your definition then I definitely will not stop defending them until such time as they no longer attacked for merely existing.
Conservatives always want to see things through an "if you're not with us, you're against us" lens and they try to force what they see of liberalism into their viewpoint. But we don't fit that mold at all -- we _just don't care_ who you are. We only care what you do.
Your skin tone, your religion, your sexual preferences. In the liberal view none of those make up a person. Only how you act and how you treat others makes up a person and if that person is an asshole, then we feel fully justified in calling you out in the (admittedly rather small) hope that you'll recognize something in yourself that you need to change to become a better person.
Of course, that entire wall of text has a big caveat on it: We use the conservative/liberal dichotomy in more than one way, and we're not very good at distinguishing our usage. A person can be socially conservative and fiscally liberal. Or the other way around. You can support gay marriage and be against abortion. Or the other way around. You can allow for polygamy but think interracial marriage is a horrible sin. Or the other way around. Personally I tend to be very liberal socially -- I think people should be allowed to be whoever the fuck they want to be and that's fine.
But other "liberal" aspects I'm more centrist on -- For example I'm fine with you having your gun and I don't support a full ban (though I'd certainly take it if that's what gets offered by some strange twist..) But I want to be damned sure you're going to be responsible with it. And I'm not just going to take your word on that. So unless you can come up with some other way to guarantee me that you (and your neighbor and Jim from 3 states over and 100 million other people) are all going to be perfectly responsible, government oversight is about the best we're going to get.
There's pretty much no subject I fall heavily to the right on though. The far right's plan in almost every instance is "me me me and fuck everyone else." I'm certainly no saint but I just can't imagine myself being that selfish.