If you're not interested in details behind the stories, you probably shouldn't read this book.

Given that it was published two days ago i obviously haven't read it yet,
but i'm certain this book contains material not previously published.
I've never seen Christopher publish anything that didn't add to the corpus.
Beren and Luthien is a good example. We all know that story to pieces,
and last year's publication didn't particularly disrupt anything,
but it was interesting to read the verse form, and there were many details which aren't surfaced elsewhere.

"Elon Musk Calls Boss of Tesla Troll Who's Heavily Invested In Oil Industry"

"calls the boss"
"calls up boss"
"phones boss"

"Elon Musk Phones the Boss of Heavily Oil-Invested Tesla Troll"

I STAND ASSUAGED!

this is an attractive theory, but needs a solid citation.

Given the very scanty details provided in the article, you seem to be leaping to conclusions.
It's unlikely that people at our level of remove from the details can accurately form an evaluation of the sort you're presenting.

Your line of reasoning is similar to lay-people second-guessing scientific experts on complex scientific topics.

Also, suppose you're totally on-target in all your points.
So what ? It's not your call whether these folks choose to do this work. It's theirs.

is https://www.crypto51.app/ saying that $630K would make me solely authoritative for the bitcoin BC for a couple hours or so ?

i mean really,
#define kGALAXY_ROT_SPD 1000000000
?

Part of the "care and maintenance of your body" should include, at the very least include annual check-ups and routine blood work. Part of the problem now is that people without insurance cannot afford to see a family doctor and learn they have a medical issue that can be easily (and usually more cheaply) treated and instead learn years on down the line they have a serious health condition.

On the PS3, Sony didn't have a mandate - they left it up to the developer/publisher.

Please describe the nature of the medical emergency.

I feel confident that if the defendant had had a competent expert to rebut the Malibu phony experts, defendant would have won.

The real story is that defendant didn't have his own expert to counter Patzer's BS

I'm sure somebody will do it just for the hell of it - picture quality be damned. Kinda like playing Fallout: New Vegas on an old TV.

don't do that.
the editor is not the boss of you.