I'd have no problem with this is roads were all built to the same specifications and funded by a large pool at federal or state level, but in reality they aren't. Residential roads are general funded by the residents in that city, town, borough, hamlet, possibly even neighborhood. So does your argument hold water if the only people paying for maintenance on that street are the residents who live on it? If 0 of your tax dollars paid for it why do you get to dictate that you should get to use it just because you paid taxes. Highways generally are funded at the state or federal level. You do pay for those. But if you're driving along highway 3.14 from City A to City Z and divert onto township C's local street that you didn't pay for with no intention of engaging with township C or helping its economy to make maintaining these roads possible what right do you really have to dictate how those streets are used?