... at least ... to get it designed right. That's because they need to throw away everything they have done so far and start over. They need to actually build the site rather than try to mish-mash a bunch of separate web products.

The business model is leasing an antenna to a consumer, and providing the connection. They don't like the fact that this is legal.

I'd like to have this kind of service, but not for TV.

Aereo leases you an antenna. They also provide you with an encrypted data feed to your antenna. As long as it is your free right to receive signals from an antenna, this is legal. And they encrypt the signal to be sure no one has tapped onto your antenna to copy the content you are receiving legally.

They are leasing you an antenna. They are connecting YOU to YOUR antenna, and doing so in a way that prevents thieves on the internet from stealing the contents so that you and only you get that signal.

... shut down OTA TV, then I'd be happy.

They are leasing you an antenna ... and connecting you to YOUR antenna for free.

Content owners that make their DRM not work for me (a Linux user) cannot consider me in their market. Therefore they would LOSE NOTHING if I crack the DRM and access their content privately.

So, does this mean it is time to fork W3C and have a more meaningful standards organization?

Rather than a foldable display, I'd rather have a display that can simple be pulled to a larger size or pushed to a smaller size (small enough to hide). This will, of course, require some much more innovative technology. But I think we will have it by 2050.

You mean treat the car as a peripheral device?

More likely the hacker took over someone's desktop machine that was running exploitable software, and was inside the network. Now they can get to file servers, source repository, etc., as soon as the person who had that desktop signs in to those servers. They probably also took over some other desktops used by people without that access. But they just keep trying and eventually get lucky. I'm sure a lot of people there were using exploitable software.

Obviously, then, 640kb is way overkill.

The reason businesses are against the ACA is because in order to lower the cost for people, it raises the cost for business. That's a big reason so many businesses are against it. The real solution to all this, of course, is a single-payer system.

Why do you limit this to imagination?

And Anonymous Coward, no doubt, has a very long record there.