Sure, I agree there should be laws, but what I don't agree to is that there should be new laws just because the old ones don't specify "on a computer."
There isn't. This bill is an amendment to the current law.
The fact that truth is not a defense is the single most fucked up thing I have ever heard and pretty much destroys any faith I have in the legal system.
It's also shenanigans, because the very first defense listed in the bill is truthful statements:
(1) It is a defence to an action for defamation for the defendant to show that the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is substantially true.
What a hacker does not do, is produce a solution that will be easily maintained.
This. A thousand times, this.
A well-rounded IT staff would be better off with more money for staying up-to-date with training and new technology than having someone dedicated to hacking together ductape solutions and bandaid fixes because the business doesn't want to spend the money/time on the right tools to doing things the right way.
Hackjobs are a nightmare to maintain, inherit or scale up, and they're usually a bit shortsighted when it comes to conditions the hacker didn't expect or think about. You should think outside the box, but you need to need to make sure what you're making will fit back inside it. The approach and the knowledge you gain from it can be really useful, but I don't want to have to do something like find a way to force an insufficient PBX to meet a company's needs any more than I want to hold my car's bumper on with bungee cords.
Hulu could stand to learn from this. In general their ads are just what they are, but they always have that "Is this ad relevant to you?" thing up in the corner. There's some ads that I dislike, so much, I actually take the effort to click no on. Surprisingly I then continue to see those ads over and over again.
Why would that be surprising? It's long-term marketing feedback, no one is going to look at that until the ad campaign is over or up for renewal. It's for the benefit of Hulu/the advertisers, so they can correlate future ad campaigns to demographics and usage, not for you to opt out of or vote away an existing ad. Hulu has sold to Company A that Ad B to be played during Term C for Target Audience D, so Ad B will continue to be played under those conditions until Term C is over. That vote against the ad isn't going to count until they're planning their next ad campaign.
Really? So poor people have to drink soda because they can't afford water? Walmart shows a 24ct case of
And that's with ignoring the facts that you can safely presume all of these people have running water at home, most of the places they're going to go in the day will have sinks and/or water fountains, water's usually free at restaurants, and per bottle size it's at most the same price as soda at convenience stores (usually cheaper).
Livestrong is not a scientific publication.
Now that's just assinine to the point of being fallacious. They cite their sources.
"'The initial capacity to operate in hostile networks has been achieved,'" Took them 6 years to notice their ethernet cable wasnt plugged in?
No, they were downloading a copy of Windows XP when the jerk stopped seeding at 99%.
I'd be surprised if there wasn't some way to turn it off
Nope. There *was* a way to, in the Developer's Preview, an obscure registry entry that wasn't obvious to anyone, but when the Consumer Preview rolled around, it was removed, and legacy code in Explorer was removed yet still in the Beta to *make damn sure* nobody can turn off Metro.
Oh, I know the prior method for turning it off is gone. But it's hard to say there won't be a way to do it until we see group policy templates.
I don't think 8 is geared for enterprise at all.
There's a dedicated Enterprise version for volume licensing. It and Pro, like usual, take the "normal" version and give it the abilities to join a domain, process group policy, use EFS, host RDP, etc.
> I. REALLY. DO. NOT. WANT. TO. SEE. YOU. IN. HIGH. HEELS. AND. A. MINISKIRT.
It's an *Anonymous* Coward on Slashdot, so you cannot possibly know who he or she is, and what their looks are.
It's an Anonymous Coward on *Slashdot*, you can pretty safely guess what his looks are.
"Don't hate me because I'm beautiful. Hate me because I'm beautiful, smart and rich." -- Calvin Keegan