Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:my filter proposal (Score 1) 255

What about the Google level filtering? I mean typing "kiddy porn" in the search engine wont get a link to uncle-toms-basement.com. If anything its just got companies selling filtering software.

The filter wouldn't of changed the kiddy porn distribution one bit because I'd imagine that stuff would be done mostly peer-to-peer.

Regardless of Govt, I think Google's done a fine job stopping what it can and that adding a filter on ISP's is quite redundant.

I always thought this filter campaign was simply a legal thawte at privacy allowing the Govt later to scrutinize peoples access better.

This is an excellent point. Here's my top 3 result of my google for kiddie porn:

http://www.detritus.org/agency/kid_porn.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography
http://www.efc.ca/pages/media/spectator.24may97c.html

(possibly) malware, wiki, and a 13 year-old scaremongering article.

Off to clean my cookies

Comment Re:Looking slightly dangerous for Rudd (Score 1) 255

Work Choices.

If Rudd didn't get into power things would have been very different during the GFC. With Work Choices in effect wages for every profession would have dropped through the floor, mass layoffs would have been commonplace and working hours increased. We are extremely fortunate that Rudd repealed Work Choices before the GFC actually hit.

What? How will wage decreases lead to increased unemployment!

Contrary to popular belief, the last three years under Rudd have not been a total disaster, our national debt is not spiralling out of control, in fact we are one of the few nations to come out of the GFC. Debt is at far less then 10% of our GDP, right now I have more cash in the bank then is required to pay my share of the national debt (A$9,050, BTW, my state of WA is in the black) and this is during a global recession.

Then you should know that the federal government had less to do with last year's growth, than China did.

Here's where you go horribly wrong. right now Labor cant do anything without the Greens and independents, I want to keep it that way. Green preferential vote goes towards Labor so Labor remains in power whilst being reliant on the Green party who has openly opposed Labors more insane policies this term such as the filter and ETS. My interest is in keeping a minor party in a position of power as they are actually afraid of being voted out. My preference is two or three minor parties but I'd also like a pony.

Bloody agreed!

Comment Re:Looking slightly dangerous for Rudd (Score 1) 255

The worst possible scenario for Australia is a dripping-wet, semi-naked Tony Abbot being elected Prime Minister. This is something we fear deep in our hearts.

Really, as a (West) Aussie I fear a federal-Rudd, state-Labor rule. Can anyone spell GST increase?

And an FYI for our overseas friends: the political party is spelt Labor, even though Aussie spelling of the word is labour.

Comment Re:Looking slightly dangerous for Rudd (Score 1) 255

Frankly the Coalition scare me more then Conroy. Both the leader of the Liberals and the Nationals are ultra conservatives (not in the good way, they are religious nutbars) so voting them in would be just as bad, probably worse then another 3 years of Rudd.

I would like to point out the Rudd is actually more of a hardened Christian than Abbott
http://www.themonthly.com.au/monthly-essays-kevin-rudd-faith-politics--300

http://www.wesleymission.org.au/releases/may05/050530c.asp

Comment I'm with India (Score 1) 108

I picked up a lovely dirt-cheap Chinese wireless card a month ago (Tenda from Jaycar in Oz for those interested).

Upon installation, the windows kept losing focus - type-type-type.. wtf (clicked back into the window).

Thought I'd watch the network traffic a bit, and sure enough; type-type-type.. window loses focus... network traffic spikes a smidgen...

Comment Re:MAC to Facebook mapping? (Score 1) 559

How on earth can you map the MAC (of assuming you wireless router) to a facebook account?

You can't without packet sniffing

Besides, it's the MAC which might be visible (don't know if it is) in the WIFI data a different one that the MAC used by the external interface which connects to the ISP?

I don't quite understand this (wording) but yes, the MAC address of the router is different from the DSLAMs'

Comment Re:OK, I have something to hide... (Score 1) 559

OK, let me take the learned man's position and agree that I have something to hide...so I should worry. Is it a crime to have something to hide? I thought not.

Now what? Yes, I have something to hide so I am worried about my privacy....so just go away Google. Just go away. Will you just leave me and my "stuff" alone please.

Interest point you've raised here. The MAC addresses are a part of the internet protocol embedded in a device you own. The protocols are - presumably - licensed by the people who have sold you the device.

Part of that protocol is open broadcast of your address, so by buying said router under license and letting it broadcast, aren't you choosing to make said information public domain?

Alternatively, do you buy the MAC address along with the router. You purchase the physical hardware - and presumably the collection of bits inside - but does it say anywhere that the protocol you are using under license allows you to restrict access to that protocol implementation from any party you so desire to block?

Lawyers could have fun with this one...

Comment Re:Tell Your Wireless ... (Score 1, Interesting) 559

wardriving involves the theft of bandwidth, which is a commodity.

What google are doing is similar to me driving around with my mobile going "oh I've just found a wifi link" and auto-logging the mac address broadcasting.

So if what google are doing is as illegal as wardriving, I'd better turn "automatically find wifi" option off on my phone...

Comment Re:The media really are pussies (Score 1) 1224

"No one has the right to live without being shocked, no one has the right to spend their life without being offended." (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQ3VcbAfd4w&feature=player_embedded).

A very important part of free speech is the ability to make fun of things, including, maybe even especially, the things people hold sacred.

I wish I had mod points now.

I'd also like to point out that - while certain people may whinge - CC are the censors here.

Comment Re:They won't back down to whacko Christian threat (Score 1) 1224

and I am sure Jewish and Hindu would be ignored.

Sorry, who?

This is nothing more than the good old policies of liberal lore where certain races are predisposed to violence, theft, or just need help getting an education because they don't have the ability to do good on their own.

um. how are these liberal policies? I would have thought that the assumption that

...certain races are predisposed to violence, theft, or just need help getting an education...

smacks of the kind of racism conservatives are generally associated with.

Comment Re:I wonder how long until it "accidentally" leaks (Score 1) 1224

I'm not a muslim, but I can speak on behalf of them based on what I see on my college campus.

I'm sorry, but on what basis can you speak for Muslims? based on "what [you] see"

What the hell do they teach you in that "college"; Stereotyping 101, How To Assume You Are Right With No Qualifications 233?

Slashdot Top Deals

"It's the best thing since professional golfers on 'ludes." -- Rick Obidiah

Working...