The only time I have tried to use inherit, it failed - "a {color:inherit}" would not work in IE - all links would be blue, regardless of the parent's colour. See http://www.musicfortheblind.co.uk/red.css
I had horrible problems trying to get inherit to work in IE before I googled it and found out that it was impossible. This and http://blogs.msdn.com/cwilso/archive/2006/08/10/694584.aspx have left me in rather an unbalanced position when it comes to IE.
Server-side language choice isn't at all a browser issue. Also, Mr. AC, other than microsoft's own PR, can you cite any security problems here? Sure, they're introducing a new rendering engine that will undoubtedly have its own security problems, but they don't combine with IE's rendering engine's problem since only one of them is being used at a time.
Most web developers jump through the hoops microsoft provide. That shouldn't be a surprise.
Because nobody's stupid enough to use the same password in more than one place.
Gread idea! And what do you propose is done once the encrypted files are downloaded? Bruteforce a key?
If they can't prove you've been watching broadcasts, they can't have you. Yeah, you could leave your tv unplugged from the aerial and you'd be fine.
Then don't "purchase" the bill. This is exactly what such a programme would be encouraging.
The difference is that a tax goes to the government and the license fee goes straight to the beeb. If you buy a TV and play games on it, the beeb get nothing.
As quarkoid said, there is a licence fee - GBP142.50 a year. And yes, they enforce the payment of this. If you really don't want to pay the fee, you can always just not watch TV.
The difference between search engines and auction sites is significant here - the main attraction of an auction site is the number of users it has, anything else is an unnecessary bonus.
Crytek didn't make FC2. It's not even on their engine.
You mean like cash? Oh wait.
God forbid people actually buy products that are targeted and marketed at them.
Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.
