Comment The lesson to take from this (Score 5, Funny) 334
The lesson to take from this is: don't store valuable information on your thermostat.
The lesson to take from this is: don't store valuable information on your thermostat.
Don't drag the neanderthals down, they were nothing to do with this. They probably died out for being more peaceful than humans.
The 37k claimed in that post includes general public. So, that post *is* inaccurate flamebait. The petition actually claims to have around 9k PhD signatories, but the list has been debunked a few times (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition#Criticism_of_the_Oregon_Petition).
If I could mod this up, I would. The indictment claims that the Mega sites (which they call the "Mega Conspiracy") is a group of sites designed to profit from the sharing of content. They they go on to say that each named "conspirator" has knowingly used the network for copyright infringement, and after being told about specific infringing files, failed to remove them. The case they are trying to establish is that the MU staff allowed infringement to continue because it profited them.
Everyone should read the indictment summary before knee-jerking in defence of the site, it does actually look quite bad for them.
This is the only comment on
I went looking for them...
These guys think indefinite copyright would maximise social welfare:
1. Optimal Copyright Length for Media Content: A Gundam Approach - http://www.jlea.jp/06kougai03.pdf
2. Optimal copyright length and ex post investment: a Mickey Mouse approach - http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1551/
3. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Copyright Law (Landes & Powney 2003): http://books.google.com/books/about/The_economic_structure_of_intellectual_p.html?id=X-KkvbT6F4UC
The only thing I could find (in Google Scholar) recommending short-lived copyright was this CED report, The Special Problem of Digital Intellectual Property (see conclusion #5) - http://www.ced.org/images/library/reports/digital_economy/report_dcc.pdf
I's like to see links to those '7 year' studies too.
If you follow the link in the pop-up, the BBC website explains that the changes will be phased in gradually over the Summer.
"The government's view is that there should be a phased approach to the implementation of these changes. Over the summer, we will be working on developing the best methods for obtaining your consent.
In the meantime, you can control cookies by setting your device to notify you when a cookie is issued, or not to receive cookies at any time. We will ensure that we continue to provide you with clear and comprehensive information about the cookies we use, so that you can make informed decisions."
On top of that, the law only covers tracking cookies, but the BBC is going to include all cookies in it's policy. No story here.
The rule on staying alive as a forecaster is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once. -- Jane Bryant Quinn