I don't have experience with the Pi boards, but I'm running Debian 10 (from armbian) with mainline kernel 5.4 on a RockPro64 and it works great.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/...

This is going to bring a while new class if software bus to live!

but my screen was blocked by a cookie wall...

25% of American adults use "Do not track", but hey, non-geek Gizmodo visitors obviously have more trouble finding the "Do not track" option in their browser settings than the average American. So much for the credibility of the Forrester Research study. And for Gizmodo, wittingly distributing bogus research results.

In the sense that people in China using Google search won't see what their government does not want them to see? Congratulations Google!

Agreed. The main risk of a self-driving car is probably not in reacting too slowly, but in scene detection breaking down. For that you need better architectures, not faster architectures.

To speak with Knuth, premature optimization is the root of all evil.

Really? If they take their neural network development seriously I don't think they know what their networks will look like in ten years. It's a research area in the middle of a transformation. Using architectures molded into hardware is probably just costly and will act as an antagonist to innovation. I don't think having 2000 vs 200 frames per second right now outweighs that downside.

"Four antennas ought to be enough for anybody." -- Steve Jobs

Yeah, can't stand these fucking exclamation marks.

If you would be sure about the 90-95% efficiently then there would be no need to be "leaning towards" the infeasibility of doubling that efficiency, isn't it?

I hope 1M is enough to fix that mess. Successfully switching between user sessions is a matter of luck; Useful panel functionality is only provided through sometimes abandoned third party extensions; For anything other than the five-or-so options in the system settings you need to resort to something like a "tweak-tool"; Then there is the wildly unnecessary "swipe up screen" that get's in your way. All in all a very bad experience. I'm switching back to 16.04 for now.

I think what they actually mean is that the costs of hosting a website and a couple of pdfs should be provided for free either by public or private funds, just like providing, editing and reviewing the scientific content is done for free by the people who signed the open letter. I can't believe a fee of $30 per online article copy is in any sensible way proportional to the actual costs the publisher has to provide that article.