As a not-quite-yet-middle-aged New Zealander by birth, I have long been fascinated by big, strong countries that formerly had empires (not enough to study it though). I lived in Russia on an exchange for a year and a half many years ago, and I spent 6 months in China, 6 months in Costa Rica (and many more countries for less). I have been living in France for the last decade. I have an aunt who (reverse-)migrated to back to England many decades ago and travel there regularly (about 30 times over the last 15 years for various reasons).
Russia lost most of its empire 20-odd years ago, France and Britain a lot longer. While the imperial romanticism I had as a child has completely disappeared, I am still very sensitive to imperial thinking and I see it daily here in France. One only needs to read the papers to see it has far from disappeared from England. These two countries, once at the heart of massive global empires, are in many ways still living in a mentality where they make choices for the world, at least in the heads of many of their citizens. Unfortunately, many international organisations still reflect the former "glory" of these countries, and not current social realities.
Why would Russia be any different? Russia lost its empire when I was a teenager and many, many people who lived through their "glory days" are still alive and voting. France and Britain have had their influence reducing for over a century now and many young people still yearn for their empires, even though they've never experienced them. The BNP (Britain) and FN (France) are an expression of this in politics, and the FN has just given France another wake-up call in last weekend's municipal elections. The problems are ostensibly economic but that is the key - France is no longer a great economic power, and when people are reminded of that looking at their bank accounts at the end of the month, they start remembering "how France used to be before Europe". Of course it's ridiculous, but that is almost never a problem in politics! Napoleon is revered by most of the population. What. The. Fuck! People who are mired in the past are likely to revert to the kind of thinking their history books teach them in times of (any kind of) trouble, wherever you live.
What Westerners never seem to get is that while the Western socio-economic system has been exported to almost every corner of the world (and the West is still the main benefactor of this fact), the new socio-economic system has not translated into simple adoption of Western values. Russians are still Russians, Chinese are still Chinese, and so on, and our belief/value structures are DIFFERENT. Certain sectors of society might be drinking the Western kool-aid (Enlightenment individualism/capitalism) but in most places around the world, the bulk of the population is not. The key is that you can't simply take what your local (i.e., Western) media presents to you and understand it in the same way a citizen of another civilisation will understand the same events. Their media will present it in a way that makes sense in their socio-cultural and historical contexts. There may (or not) be a significant disconnect between how the facts are presented but there will definitely be a disconnect in how they are interpreted. We shouldn't overstate differences but neglecting them, and rashly dishing out the labels "Good" and "Evil", are simply signs of ignorance.
Money and status are parts of the equation (aren't they always?) but reducing such a magnificently complex situation to 1 or 2 (or even 15) factors is reductionist and misses much of the rich, multi-layered interactions that are playing out. The West is far from innocent in many areas, and acts in its interest the vast majority of the time, even if that means funding coups and installing dictators. Many, many Western corporations are involved in some of the most heinous human rights abuses, either directly or indirectly. When it suits us we often chose to rationalise this by falling back on notions of "economic freedom" but the results are the same. Nothing is black, nothing is white, and how we chose to see the world is often, alas, simplified so far it no longer makes much sense at all. The current situation between (the) Ukraine and Russia, and the role of Western Europe, has been reduced in our media to such a banal level that any deep analysis is utterly impossible, whether or not you have any knowledge of the Russian civilisation.