Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Throttling? (Score 2, Informative) 115

Virgin Media (In the UK) throttles your speed if you download a certain amount of data between certain times. For example, on the M package, if you download 1.5 GB between 1000 and 1500, they bring you down to 200 or 300 kbps. That seems fair to ensure that nobody's encroaching on someone else's speeds (although I'm no network engineer, so someone else can confirm whether this is a legitimate line of reasoning by them).

Also, you're supposed to say "First Post"

Comment Re:I'd love to talk to someone knowledgeable about (Score 2, Interesting) 306

It depends on the meteorite being studied. When a meteorite is discovered, scientists can study it and compare it to moon rocks. They can compare the composition and makeup of the rock with the moon rocks and they'll find that the meteorites bear a strong resemblance, thus making it probable that it came from the moon.

For Martian meterorites, they can look at a few other things. You can first check to see if it's igneous. That indicates that it might have come from a place with molten rock and it solidified at some point. That in turn indicates that this came from a planetary body. Now that you've established it came from a planet or a moon and not the asteroid belt, you examine other things. The meterorite might have gas bubbles in it, so you compare the composition of the gas with your knowledge of the atmosphere of other planets. In the case of ALH84001, they may have seen that the rock had lots of Fe, like Mars, and that it had gas bubbles which matched what previous landers on the planet may have observed. They then come to the conclusion that the meteorite in question is probably from Mars.

As for your other questions, the wikipedia article rightly points out that ALH84001 might have been contaminated. That's why you see articles like this peppered with maybe and probably every few words.

Comment Naysayer (Score 3, Interesting) 221

I know I'm going to sound like a naysayer, so, hey, I may as well nay say.

Google's probably going for a tablet as well, so 2010 will likely be the year of the tablet - in the form of iphones and iclones, with much larger screens, the next must-have at the coffee shops. But it's going to fall flat on its face. It's too close to netbooks, but not as useful as a netbook.

Nay, I say, nay

Comment Re:Extremely predictable plot... (Score 2, Funny) 782

Two scenes in particular. The first where she's teaching him how to 'fall' and use the leaves to break the fall. The second was when they introduce the "last shadow" pterodactyl. My thoughts, out loud, were "I wonder where that's going to be used in the story."

I saw someone rolling his eyes so much they became unscrewed and he had to be taken to a mechanic.

Comment Re:Science Fiction? (Score 3, Insightful) 782

Saw it in 3D at the Imax. I think that this movie is visually appealing, and that's what it was made for. You're not supposed to actually pay attention to the story; it's a mix of Dances with Wolves and Fern Gully (and potentially about 30 other movies in which this concept of gung-ho-soldier-meets-and-loves-the-natives has been done to death), although it does strike chords with a few present day "situations". The main appeal is the graphics, the atmosphere, surroundings and facial expressions of the macrosmurfs.

Part of the hype was that Cameron spent 8 bazillion years working on this movie and that's another thing that spoils it, you expect something great and wonderful and almost Star Wars like, but you get another popcorn movie, albeit an expensive one. With blue people.

Slashdot Top Deals

Happiness is twin floppies.

Working...