Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:BB removed it (Score 5, Informative) 437

There is further clarification in the comments. Xeni Jardin replied:

We've reached out to the photographer, who appears to be a friend of Cory, and mentions Cory. It appears that the Slashdot post was from an anonymous Slashdot reader who was trolling for attention, not from the photographer, as Rob stated earlier. Not from a rightsholder, but from someone trying to punk Slashdot and prank Cory while Cory was away (he says so pretty clearly in this blog post).

I think that may warrant a little clarification in the summary.

Comment Re:Reprint It (Score 1) 437

And he probably hasn't gotten a response back from the guy because he emailed him about a blog post that is titled Gone Fishin because the dude literally fucking left to go camping in the woods and included a photo of a hammock. Give me a break.

It has also been less than 24 hours since it was even posted and the Poster is already being advised to sue. That's some pretty expert-level gun-jumping.

Comment Re:Reprint It (Score 2, Funny) 437

So... the caption that the artist placed on the photo that Cory posted on BoingBoing reads:

Restoring a hammock to Moonwatcher's Point, courtesy of Cory Doctorow. All is now right with the world. Feel free to drop by when you need a moment's peace. And thank the kindness of strangers.

I don't even know what's happening now. Is this what a stroke feels like?

Comment Re:Is BoingBoing's use "Commercial"? (Score 1) 437

But in this instance, I suspect the overwhelming majority of those eyeballs are there to hear about Cory's vacation. Of the reasons they are viewing those ads, I suspect the small image of a lake and a hammock is not in the top 5.

If the headline read: "Check out this photo!" Then yes, they're 'exchanging' it for ad revenue, but it didn't, the photo was superfluos (ex: It had been removed and the draw and content of the article would seem unchanged). This specific usage, with full attribution and link (which the BB article originally had), would seem like a good thing to me.

Comment Re:Will it really matter? (Score 3, Insightful) 617

I mean, from what I understand, schools just plain do not hold anyone back because they fail...they just continue to promote them on to the next grade regardless of their level of learning the material.

Depends on the school district, around here they can only hold them back once, then they have to advance them. It isn't about self esteem, not entirely anyway, if the kids don't do well (don't pass), the state cuts funding and fucks it up for everyone. Fuck up too much, and the school has to close, overloading the other schools and the slow downward spiral continues. Teacher salaries are also based on standardized test scores; which is extra fun if you teach special needs kids who either don't take them or cannot do that well. The state of affairs in the public school system here is beyond reckoning, and every "attempt" to fix it just seems to make it worse.

Comment You don't have to worry about spoilers... (Score 1) 196

You don't have to worry about spoilers because there aren't any. This is a painfully brief blurb from July 8th, before the movie was released, and only directly makes reference to a few scenes in the trailer.

Which is disappointing because I was really hoping for something of substance. The "article" spends more time talking about Courbould's other projects than Inception.

Comment Re:Keyboard and mouse (Score 2, Interesting) 324

They don't even have to offer a keyboard/mouse controller. Offer a controller with a (good) touchpad in place of the right thumbstick. WSAD+Shift only offers 2bit input for movement, so the thumbstick is superior there. So this would give you absolute input for aiming, and high-res relative input for motion. Sounds damn near perfect to me.

Comment Re:This is what pisses me off about police (Score 1) 765

They said that unless he stole over a thousand dollars worth of stuff it wasn't even worth it to assign it to an officer regardless of how much information we had.

Sounds like a pretty reasonable claim: had they actually preformed the more cost effective service and written you a check to cover your insurance deductible.

Comment Re:Pixels aren't little squares (Score 1) 304

IANA Mathematician, but thinking about it more: You wouldn't actually need the shape. If you split a square in half at a given angle, you will get triangles and rectangles he seems to describe. One byte can store 0-180 in 12 15 degree increments, leaving 4 values to alternately mimic the "pixel" above it, to the left, up and to the left, or up and to the right. Then read them as 2 pixel pairs, where the 4 alternate values of subpixel 2 reference to the right, lower-right,down, and lower-left. Given a 36 pixel block you could store as 2 subpixels:


sx1: 0xR(ot)AARRGGBB
sx2: 0xR(ot)AARRGGBB

where sx1 Rotation defines 1 radian from 0-180 and sx2 rot defines a radian from 180-360, and uses them to slice the block into two colored regions (or references an identically shaped and colored neighbor). Slap a compression algorithm on that data structure, and it might actually crunch up nicely.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Working...