Dude it's not openSSL that's really flawed, I mean boo hoo, they hid and passed under everyone's nose some faults then made it blow up in everyone's face, so what, even if you had a perfect OpenSSL, if the hardware itself is fucked, you're out of luck, you can throw any kind of software at it, they can watch the screen as you can watch it when you type, they can log the keystrokes, etc., the hardware itself is rigged. Why wouldn't it be? Duh! Which is what this whole Russian chip article is about, getting secure hardware, but they go about it by yet another anal retentive way, design your own custom code for an Arm processor, then send it off to a chip foundry somewhere (i'm guessing the chip foundries in Korea, Japan or Taiwan, maybe US for IBM, or Puerto Rico and Malaysia for Intel, if IBM and Intel are willing to do subcontracting for Arm), then voilà, get your own secure chip the easy way. Yet another bullshit they are trying to pass by everyone, hey, everyone, your computer is secure, start hiding some secrets in it, we swear we can't see them! By the way Arm is retarded in the way that they are a pure intellectual property company, they own absolutely no physical manufacturing facilities, and most of the Arm chips are made in the East Asian Tiger countries. At least IBM and Intel does have their own fabs and don't trust it to someone else, in fact I was looking to get different commercial versions of Unix instead of Linux on ebay for cheap, and guess what, I got Solaris 8 for like 8 bux for Intel platform, but there is no way to get IBM AIX for intel platform, can you guess why? Because IBM is not retarded enough to trust Intel chips and assume liability over what happens on them. Which is why Microsoft ditches any liability too for their software, because they don't make the whole shebang computer. If you want trustworthy computing, get it from IBM that makes both the AIX Unix software, and the chips, be it RS/6000, or PowerPC, or System/370 Mainframes, but in each case IBM controls both the hardware and the software part, so they can assume liability when the shit hits the fan, as opposed to going after Microsoft or Intel, and they point the finger at each other, saying it's not my fault, it's the other guy's responsibility. Maybe that's why the computing business moved from IBM dominance into the MS/Intel way of doing business, of evading responsibility reasons. Dividing up responsibility between two or more people means no responsibility, the best slogan in a team environment when trying to find who's responsible is the standard answer from every single person: it wasn't me, I didn't do it. In a job environment if you can figure out a way to make people work alone, divide up the work to single person unit stages, with personal responsibility in each, you automatically get a magical improvement in quality, productivity and profitability. If you can't divide up the responsibility, then military style top down command works better than some ad-hoc gang of nobody's in charge and responsible. And in such cases being on the bottom keeps you out of the responsibility most, saying I was just following the command of my superiors, and didn't really care, (care is not the best word, didn't really fight them, didn't really hold up production over an issue i felt was not right) because they were responsible if it didn't work out correctly. Monarchy style top down command if often more efficient than Congress-like debate between a few hundred elected representatives, who take forever to decide, so in time of war the President is like a dictator for the military, and Congress and Senate can criticize or overrule weeks of months later, but they cannot make the on time, millisecond decisions required by war, like a monarch, or dictator-like president. Which is how teamwork in a work environment is often most efficient, we all listen to one guy, and do what he says, not because we agree with it, or he is the smartest, in fact he could be the dumbest of us but we put him in charge and listen to him and do what he says, because if we all voiced our disagreements, it would bog us down to being completely paralyzed. Each ship has one captain, not two, nor ten, nor 100 captains, debating which way to swerve the ship trying to avoid an iceberg. He may not be the smartest of the crew, it'd be nice if he were, but it doesn't really matter as much as following chain of command. It doesn't really matter if you swerve to the left or to the right, but the whole sailor team on deck has to move as one, commanded by the captain, and if it takes you 10 minutes of debating and round table discussions to make up your mind how to steer the ship, because you're not sure, it's too late, you're on top of the iceberg and sinking like the Titanic. By the way in ancient Crete I think there were dual kings, that would debate between themselves over what to do. So according to Sartre and existentialism, when you execute the command of a captain in which way to swerve the ship, to the left or right, you're personally responsible, you can't avoid personal responsibility saying you were simply following orders, but that's what most people end up doing. But such blindly following orders can be a big issue in cases of Nazi holocaust prisoners, or Richard the Lionheart's execution of the civilian population of Tyre during a Holy Crusade to recapture Jerusalem for Judeo-Christians from Muslims.
So anyway, to recapitulate, the present dominant Intel/Microsoft computing world may be set up that way to evade responsibility by each of the duo, or trio with AMD, if you're looking for responsibility you need to find someone like IBM who can make both the chips and the software, and have nobody else to point the finger at, and this idea that a securely coded SSL gives you a secure computing environment when you don't know jack about the hardware, and subcontracting it out to some foreign country's pure IP company, like the British Arm Holdings, headquartered in Cambridge, who subcontract the actual hardware making to a chip foundry in Taiwan or Korea. How is Russia to trust all this, and how are they gonna keep up production if WW3 breaks out? Idiots! Which is what this whole article is testing, how retarded slashdotters are about it.
By the way, back in the late 80's, in the eastern European communist bloc, the highest achievement of the USSR, electronically speaking was a Sokol pocket radio with 7 transistors, unbreakable (anything russian, like cars, radios, guns, is made for retards and has to be unbreakable/uncloggable, and the retards still find a way to break it, or clog it up by dragging it through mud, which is why russian firearms are so highly prized, because they are built to be dragged through mud and still function) and some TV's along the same lines, if they weren't all still tube TV's, while at the same time from the capitalist west you got an IBM XT with a 5 1/4 floppy running MS DOS with GW Basic, with guess how many transistors in the CPU? A whole lot more than 7. So while the Russians beat the west into space flight with Gagarin back in the day right after WW2, they got stuck in innovation, never really having any chip foundries ever at all by the time of the communist government's collapse. And I don't think they can still make any chips even today. So there is not much to worry about at the present about chips coming from Eastern Europe/Russia for a while, If anything the West (i.e. Western Europe (starting at the line of Finland, Germany, Czech, Austria, Italy and more west, the other side of the iron curtain being Russia, Lithuainia, Latvia, Estonia, Belarus, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, old Yugoslavia, Albania, and Greece is up in the air), then USA, Canada, Australia, Argentina and used to be South Africa during apartheid) has more to worry about China making their own chips, and as far as Korea, Japan and Taiwan is concerned, they are already making most of the world's chips (like 80%), but India, because of severe overpopulation and rolling blackouts may be behind both China and Russia, if ever, being able to design and their own chips, and India(Pakistan, Bangladesh) may be the first place in the world with major collapse in society over lack of resources and overpopulation. Hopefully not. The future is always uncertain.