Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Good idea, but... (Score 1) 670

On paper, it sounds great. But, you'd be gambling with the other guy. This is because there are only two players in the US that support GSM devices; there's only one other option for leaving AT&T - T-Mobile. Now, maybe some don't currently have issues with T-Mobile. But, who's to say that they won't follow suit and try pushing the same shenanigans as being discussed here? The underlying problem in this case is the US is the lack of (better) GSM provider competition.

Scenario: "This company is for saps, I'm going elsewhere!....(looks around)...wait, there's only one other option? Oh...I *really* hope they treat me better." End up not being satisfied with that company? Well then there's two options for your GSM device:
1. Suck it up and return from where you came.
2. The less convenient method involving moving out of the country.

Comment Re:Not surprising (Score 1) 911

...in contrast, is not just a cheap laptop. It fills a distinctly different need to a laptop. I've not entirely worked out what that need is - it seems to target a market that doesn't contain me - but it's clearly not the same set of uses as a laptop.

Couldn't help but chuckle after reading this description, as it for some reason reminded me of the Palm Foleo. DISCLAIMER: I am not insinuating that the iPad is the same things as a Foleo. Just thought it was interesting how the intended use of the Foleo has some similarities with this description. Also interesting to see what Palm got wrong, mainly hardware tie-in.

Comment Re:My Own Personal Experience (Score 1) 326

It was originally part of a media bundle (Mediamax or some name along those lines, text messaging for so much plus data for $15) which they don't offer that particular package any longer. This was back when they were still having their identity crisis and trying to figure out who they were - Cingular or ATT.

Comment My Own Personal Experience (Score 4, Informative) 326

My experience with both, and T-Mobile is that they do not offer reduced rates if you intend to use a phone you acquired from another source. Their rate plans are all designed with the intent that they should subsidize the purchase of a new phone for much less money based on the entering of a long duration contract. In effect, the telecoms are financing your cell phone-except that if you already have one, you dont get a reduced rate.

Really? Here's my recent experience:

I was recently looking to upgrade my phone. My last phone was from ATT with a two year contract, and I wanted something more updated and faster. When I signed the contract, I was able to get unlimited data added for $15/mo. (they no longer offer this plan) So I looked around for a while and debated between the subsidized Nokia E71x, or an unlocked Nokia model. Now the ATT subsidized Nokia was only $99 after rebate, with of course another two year contract. An unlocked Nokia E75 was $399 after $50 rebate.

However, the subsidized E71x required their PDA/Smartphone data package which is $30/mo - that seemed pretty ridiculous because I was currently getting unlimited data at $15/mo. After talking with an ATT rep, I found that if I bought an unlocked phone I could either grandfather in my old plan and leave it be with the data at $15/mo, or I could upgrade my plan to a current package and tack on unlimited data for only $10/mo! The reason is that ATT cannot force an unsubsidized phone to use their "special" data plans tailored for their subsidized models (please - $30/mo just because the phone has a QWERTY?)

You can do the math. Needless to say, although I've spent more money upfront on a phone, I can recover the cost before two years. If the phone lasts/stays with me longer than two years, I'll be saving even more from it.

Btw, not only are unlocked phones nicer to have in case of travelling/switching providers, you also aren't stuck with the customized provider firmware that they slap onto the phone. From past experiences I've found that the branded firmware often limits advanced functionality.

Comment Agreed on MK (Score 1) 210

Second for Mario Kart with the motion sensor. I started on it that way, and have stuck with it since. I can get precision turns with the complimentary intuitiveness of steering. Mario Kart seems to be the most refined implementation of a driving game for Wii using motion sensors - Nintendo did their homework very well.

Then again, I'm probably one of very few who plays Geometry Wars with the pointer. Personally, I like how it works over standard analog controls, I just feel it's more accurate.

I think many people try the motion control, get fed up after a few minutes, and revert to what they've been used to for decades. From presonal observation, it seems like they just don't want to take the time to learn it - they just want to play.

Comment Re: People don't really believe in Noah's Flood (Score 2, Interesting) 1306

Let's assume the Earth is only a few thousand years old.

Just to clarify:

This would be addressing those whose viewpoint of creation is that the earth really is only a few thousand years old. Unfortunately the Bible actually does not support this viewpoint.

In the Genesis account, the Hebrew word rendered "day" does not refer to a literal 24 hour period - this word can in fact refer to simply "a long time" or "the time covering an extraordinary event." So, each creative "day" as spoken of in the Bible could have been multiple thousands of years.

Comment Free Marketing (Score 3, Insightful) 606

Whilst the touch screen might look all fancy, it's not very useful when you're walking down a crowded street and just want to stick your hand in your pocket and skip to the next track.

Ah, but how would they receive free marketing if you never pulled out your fancy device in a crowded area? People would not be able to woo as they watch you touch your phone and wish to themselves they had their own.

No doubt Apple realized that each time someone used it in a public setting it would be a conversation piece or at the very least get people to think to themselves, "Oh, hey, it's that one phone!", at least during the phone's initial debut. If people are simply pressing buttons, let alone out of the view of public, they lose some buzz.

There are people who are still in awe over the phone, however most of them have gone out and bought one themselves so that they can publicly display the phone themselves. This then becomes a situation of people simply displaying it publicly in hopes to look important or culturally elite, as no doubt all of us have seen quite more than we'd care to.

Comment Why? (Score 3, Interesting) 466

I realize that there is some intent of humor behind the post, but really why would it be so hard to believe that someone actually gave Vista a serious look as opposed to having a blog-formed bias against it before using it? Yes, XP is not "giant piece of crap" but Vista is better.

Sorry, I'm just tired of hearing crap flung against Vista when people don't give it a serious look. I look forward to Windows 7 for somewhat similar reasons as the Vista-haters - we won't hear any more about Vista. But the difference is that I'm hoping it will take the bias away as well.

Slashdot Top Deals

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...